Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Largest useful number 2017-07-15 08:49:07 Post No. 9037701
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Largest useful number 2017-07-15 08:49:07 Post No. 9037701
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: thinkinggif.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 460x259px
Graham's number is awesome, but I call BS on it's usefulness. It gives the outer bound to a number that is barely useful. What is the largest number that is actually used in any applied way?
>>
A parsec. Idk, your question is retarded.
>>
The successor of the smallest non-useful number, which often comes up when discussing impredicativity (c.f. Berry paradox).
>>
Its 9, any larger than that and its just showboating.
>>
>>9037709
>The successor of the smallest non-useful number
Shit, that's exactly the wrong way around.
That should have been "successor of the largest useful number".
>>
>>9037801
>Its 9
But how then would I be able to describe the size of my dong?
>tfw 10 mm penis
>>
>>9037703
That's just 1 if you measure it in parsecs
>>
>>9037813
0.3241 attoparsecs
>>
>>9037701
how about TREE(3) ?
>>
>>9039006
what is it used for? i've found no good explanations
>>
>>9037816
and measured in light-years, it's barely larger than pi
>>
>>9037813
Twice the size of a 5mm micropenis
desu I don't think you need anything past 5
>>
In cryptography, the larger the prime number you can calculate, the better. So, inf.
>>
>>9039230
why is that?
>>
Is there a point to anything higher than 1 and 0?
>>
>>9039417
isnt that what mochizuki is doing?
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2