what if intelligence cannot be adequately quantified because

then we'll have to just work with a decent enough approximation that provides predictive ability

Sounds like something a brainlet would say

>>9032105
>what if intelligence cannot be adequately quantified

It never could. You can only quantify similarities in psychological projection.

dude lips looks like some mf pussy lips lol

It can be quantified, but only in certain ways.

Intelligence is not a static property. How tired, hungry, or stressed you are will drastically change your scores on an IQ test.

>>9032105
>non-material substance
oxymoron
if anything it cannot be quantified because the brain is too complex for modern neuroscience

>>9032105
We can score neural nets can't we?

Tell my why organic brains are any different

File: FKYI6096.jpg (4KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 150x150px

>>9032404
>oxymoron
>if anything it cannot be quantified because the brain is too complex for modern neuroscience

the mind exists in information, structured by the sign vessels that organize into quasi-abstract systems by encoding and intererpreting meaning from the information.The information that isn't worth a shit on its own.
information is physical but it is not matter
the mind is abstracted from it
modern nueroscince is gay cuz old guard trash biosemiotic a shit

>>9032390
And interaction

>>9032105
What's the physiological basis of differences in IQ?