why does 1+1=2?

>>9030974
because 2 is just another way of saying 1+1

>>9030974
I guarantee that if you can prove 1+1[math]\neq[/math]2 without dividing by zero or otherwise going full retard you'll get a Fields Medal.

What do you want it to equal?

1 + Dark Number = 2

>>9030974
Because of how we agree to define "1," "2," "+"and "="

File: IMG_7006.jpg (67KB, 750x498px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 750x498px

>>9030974

>>9030988
>nwah nwah if you can't prove me wrong, it means I'm right >;)

File: 1234354657667654.png (12KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 900x900px

>>9032051
>nwah

>>9030974
1+1 = 2, where 2 is defined as the answer to the question.

File: sillybritbong.jpg (6KB, 176x260px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 176x260px

leave 1+1=2 to me

File: gödel.jpg (7KB, 193x261px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 193x261px

>>9033891
*blocks your path*

>>9032051
right [math]\iff[/math] can't be proven wrong
So yeah if you can't prove me wrong I'm right. Prove me wrong, fuccboi.

>>9033987
What kind of brainlet are you? Assuming mathematics is consistent Godel's incompleteness theorems guarantee that there are true statements that cannot be proven (right or wrong as the ability to prove one disproves the other).

So while right -> can't be proven wrong (soundness) the converse is obviously false.

Reconsider existence.

>>9033891
>>9033894
Formal, axiomatic kek