Evolution BTFO

>self.antinatalism

>>9030887
based incelbro

>>9030899

well its technically not the incel's fault he can't get laid due to his bad genes and poor social skills development during his childhood years.

>>9030909
based deterministbro

>>9030910

>you get to choose your genes before you are born

>>9030887
The first sentence is wrong, the other part is not necessarily wrong

>>9030933
>The first sentence is wrong,

Then explain how so many ugly and fat people (like my parents, aunts and uncles) manage to reproduce.

>>9030935
It does increase your chances of survival, though in our current environment it doesn't matter (or hardly does)
As for reproduction, it would have mattered, but in our current environment it does less so

But I think the role of luck is underestimated in life, so I agree with that

>>9030946
>though in our current environment it doesn't matter (or hardly does)

It never mattered anyway for the most of recorded human history. Say for example you are an experienced Roman soldier in battle. All that experience and slashing skills won't count for shit when an arrow pierces through your eye and back of your skull because some barbarian got lucky his first time.

Pretty much, all causality is reasoned backward.

>>9030958
recorded human history is brief and civilisation doesn't negate environmental effects

>>9030887
NB4 reference to Teela Brown gene.

>>9030887
t. self-pity evolving into masochism

File: Having a drink.jpg (19KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 413x395px

>I don't know what a probability distribution is: the post
I know the Creationist who's been hanging around is getting a little desperate, but this is low-effort no matter what. sad!

He's right, you know. It's not the fittest who pass on their genes, it's the good looking. And looks is 100% genetics. I can deadlift 5pl8, meaning I'm extremely fit, but still don't get laid because I have an ugly face. Whoever told you evolution was about fitness was just trolling you.