Anomalous Artifacts

>>9025724
>believing any of that shit is what some conspiracy website says it is


so you're retarded? is that what you post is trying to say?

>>9025731
>believing an extremely controlled version of history passed to him in grade school
>never questioning
t.when a perfect little goy

File: Gay.jpg (349KB, 781x750px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 781x750px

hello again, Creationist dick-holster. I see that as usual, you've run away from your last thread (>>9023246) once several people called you on your bullshit, since you can't actually defend any of your imbecilic claims.


>Guadaloupe Woman: Miocene
not actually from the Miocene; was found buried in loosely consolidated beach sediment and was later claimed, based on a fundamental misunderstanding of sedimentology, to be from the Miocene.

>Calaveras Man: Pliocene
an obvious hoax that was definitively debunked within three years of its "discovery". a miner admitted to planting it, and chemical analysis determined it to be modern.

>Kanapoi Elbow: 4.15 mya (Pliocene)
that part of the elbow is nearly indistinguishable between chimps and humans. KP 271 cannot be definitively identified as modern human, and more recent studies have tentatively identified it as A. anamensis

>Paluxy Man: Mesozoic (most likely Jurassic)
theropod footprints that have been smushed by sagging mud. the imprints of the three big toes are there if you look.

>Tiwanaku: 12,000 BC (Late Pleistocene)
no older than ~1500 BCE. the 12,000 BCE claim is based on ONE GUY fucking up the math. there is no geological evidence to support his erroneous claim.

>Klerksdorp Spheres: 3 bya (Precambrian)
fucking MINERAL CONCRETIONS. you're as bad as those faggots who pick up an iron concretion and think it's a dinosaur egg.

It's all been said, done, and definitely debunked before. Scurry away! Go start another thread so you can pretend none of this ever happened! Only this time, do it on >>>/x/!
>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/a_anomaly.html

the flood.

scientism has an explanation for everything an the royal society cover up everything they can't
explain in the context of supportig the royal family's claim of descent that they are descended from william the conquerer and not actually imposters from scythia.

the new chronology and the antediluvian world hypothesis will answer most of your questions about out of place artifacts

>>9025847
OP unequivocally rekt

>>9025724
>all dismissed prematurely by mainstream science, as it contradicts their worldview

Except recently the oldest human remains entered into public knowledge, pushing back the date of when humanity was walking the earth.

File: clapping-gif7.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>9025847

Where is Aristotle's diamond?

First time on /sci/

Seems like a garbage board at first glance

>>9028718
>Seems like a garbage board at first glance
We're constantly getting /pol/ and /x/ folk wandering in here.
Just stay out of "race and intelligence", "free energy" and flat Earth threads.
Then there's the usual /sci/ bullshit threads:
Fermi paradox
memedrive
free will
consciousness isn't real
time isn't real
holographic universe
etc.
Then there's about 30% of the board is decent stuff.

>>9028711
>Where is Aristotle's diamond?
What is it? Google doesn't turn up shit.