Learning Physics and Astrophysics.

>>9004917
Just follow standard university physics curriculum

>>9004926
But is there any specific books I could start with and where should I start with math?

bump me up inside

>>9004935
Well Mit OpenCourseware is a start, but can be a bit difficult to navigate at times, and is also incomplete in certain areas as you won't really find a complete course with everything you need occasionally however they provide some useful college textbook recommendations that can be easily found on Amazon. Also you should be aware of the preliminaries surrounding astrophysics and physics being atleast a fundemental knowledge of multifvariable and single variable calculus and of course the rudimentary high school education.

I heard Halliday is a good place to start for intro physics if you know precalculus and intro calculus.

>>9004940
>>9004949
Thats perfect thank you guys! Currently starting into higher level maths so should be fun to move towards physics soon and there after!

University Physics with Modern Physics - Young and Freedman

Elementary Calculus - Keisler

Matrices and Linear Algebra- Schneider Barker

Start with those

>>9005042
don't be a nigger with these for-profit mass produced textbooks

Halliday for Intro Physics

Knisley for Intro Calculus

David Lay for Linear Algebra

enjoy being STEM master race

File: 10ARr36.jpg (105KB, 499x688px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 499x688px

>>9004917
Hopefully OP is still lurking

I found this to be useful for undergrad physics:
https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2016/8/13/so-you-want-to-learn-physics

>>9005277
>taking STEM advice from a grill
don't do this

>>9005277
>>9005287
okay I'm done memeing misogyny, definitely recommending not to do this, she straight up recommends Larson for mathematics and Young for physics, you're going to be a lobotomized brainlet by the time you're done with this