Why are boys biger than girls

>>9003417
sexism

Male privelage

>>9003417
b is 2nd letter in alphabet
g is 7th

>>9003417
patriarchy

>>9003417
UGH NO
girls can be just as big sweetie

cavemen ran and hunted for food
cave women stayed in the cave and defended the children

>>9003417
Oppreshun

File: drph6y9csy4z.jpg (36KB, 800x782px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x782px

>>9003475
Blue board pls delet

MODS

>>9003431
>>9003445
>>9003462
>>9003481
THESE

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.svt.se%2Fnyheter%2Fvetenskap%2Fdarfor-ar-kvinnor-kortare-an-man&edit-text=

>Women are almost always shorter than men. Now scientists argue that it's because girls get less food and poorer opportunities to grow.
Around the world, women are on average shorter than men. Pure biological suggests that it should be the opposite, that is, women should be bigger than men. Honors that give you can benefit from large fat reserves, and the planet's very greatest creature is not just a blue whale, but a blue-whale's female . If women were generally larger, the risks associated with childbirth would also decrease. In many developing countries, complications associated with childbirth are the most common cause of death among women. And those who suffer the hardest are small-grown women with small pelvis, which in turn is more common where there is a nutritional deficiency.

>Boys get more food
>New theories suggest that power balance and discrimination are behind the length differences. According to several researchers, we unconsciously give boys more food than girls, which means that the length difference between the sexes can last for generations.

>"I would argue that there is no society but some form of dominance. It is unbelievable that we have not discovered this before, "says anthropologist Paola Tabet.

>We are so used to men being longer than women that most of us hardly reflect on why that's the case. But on closer reflection, the difference in length is something of a mystery. The scientific documentary "Therefore, women are shorter than men" appear in the world of science tonight, and it explores a variety of explanatory models.

I read somewhere once sexual dimorphism is exacerbated by a few men meeting with a lot of women back in the day, or vice versa.
Can anyone back this up?

>>9003417

nature intends that the male gather/hunt for the female, who tends for the offspring. it's only natural and god given that the male be built for the job he's meant for.

>>9003417
Patriarchic oppression, Misogyny & Bigots.

But a Short Fat woman can identify herself as Tall Muscular man if it makes her feel better.

>>9003547
>men are bigger so they need more food
>somehow this is backwards

>>9003417
Why not?

File: Pepe cry hands.jpg (5KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 150x150px

>>9003417
>Boys bigger than girls
>tfw 5'4''

>>9003417
cuz booys have biger skellingtone

>>9004229
Sexist

>>9005018
Manlet, get out of MY stem

>>9003417
Sexual dimorphism. It's just the way we developed as a species for some reason. If it. Akes you feel better you can practice transpecism and become a whale (females are bigger) or become a tape worm where there is literally no sex/ gender because they are hermphrodites.

>>9005018
kek

women are the sexual selectors of male traits to copy and determined big guys get scanned.

>>9005018
Shouldn't that face be more upward-oriented?

>>9004229
>implying they aren't bigger because they were given more food in the first place
>implying they don't need more food because they were initially given more food
>implying they even need more food

>>9003417
Men like to fuck small women so only small women got to reproduce.

>>9006282
S..stop it, please

File: tallgirls-188.jpg (87KB, 620x800px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 620x800px

>manlet no reproduce

weaker females were easier to rape so were more likely to reproduce

>>9007975
that is a child

File: pepe cry hands II.png (28KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 150x150px

>>9006282
Fixed it for him.

>>9008654
Nice

If evolution had stalled our intelligence at the stone age permanently, human females would have evolved into dwarfish sexually mature children with freakishly huge pelvises and breasts.

Our most recent "natural" niches had young males as endurance predators, old males as harem guards, young females as gatherers and old females as babysitters.

Evolution continues beyond sapience, but in new directions. Females are no longer moving toward a smaller, less energy using form relative to the male.
Whether females will become larger, males become smaller, or both stay mostly the same in the millennia to come is difficult to say.

I feel it most likely that we'll take direct control of our evolution through either genetic engineering or eugenics or both, and rapidly diverge into multitudes of species and subspecies of all shapes and size.

File: nanotech.jpg (74KB, 620x363px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 620x363px

>>9003417

File: Dazai_Osamu.jpg (62KB, 254x382px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 254x382px

>tfw 5'9"

>>9003502
O I thought he was holding his tail like scare Dumbo. You gave me mighty bamboozle insten.

>>9007975
>r/Asianmasculinity in one pic

>>9003547
>>9006316
>>Women are almost always shorter than men.

Because women go through puberty earlier so puberty and thus vertical growth end sooner.

>>9012618
Going through puberty earlier doesn't mean they grow less in the puberty stage, or that they spend less time than men in puberty

>>9008654
Thanks. I will use this from now on

>>9003417
The growth Hormones & Nutrients concentrates in the Breasts, Hips & Buttocks in Woman . Rather than legs, arms or trunk.

File: 1476610258467.jpg (87KB, 474x460px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 474x460px

>>9003417
Aliens created humans by editing Monkey genome.

File: 1468752967890.jpg (216KB, 1024x1420px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1024x1420px

Did you ask something?

>>9003417
girls are raised to believe that it's feminine to stay shorter

File: socialconstructbatman.jpg (43KB, 310x306px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 310x306px

>>9003417
Height is a social construct
Just like weight, race, intelligence, gender, beauty standards.

>>9013029
>doesn't mean they grow less in the puberty stage
True but the growth stage ends earlier.

>or that they spend less time than men in puberty
I didn't mean to imply this.

>>9013334
RUNDOWN
U
N
D
O
W
N

>>9013344
Race and beauty standards actually social constructs though, racial classifications and beauty standards have varied significantly between societies

>>9013579
But if the growth stage starts earlier, they spend the same amount of time in the growth stage, so your explanation doesn't work.

>>9013653
>But if the growth stage starts earlier, they spend the same amount of time in the growth stage, so your explanation doesn't work.

The end of puberty ends vertical growth.
Girls, on average, start puberty earlier but it does't last longer than in boys. So puberty ends earlier for them. So boys, in the long run, end up taller since they stop growing later in life.

>>9003450

Seven is a bigger number than Two...

Your math doesn't add up...

What's the answer