What are the /sci/ approved youtube channels?
Harvard Math
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZgHOeJBfMKOZ5PMlZysy8Q
https://www.youtube.com/user/JordanPetersonVideos
Nikolaj-K
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcrSMnEYhIPX_p127jI23qw
just search for Feynman and watch them all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRxAn2DRzgI
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXl0Zbk8_rvjyLwAR-Xh9pQ
>>8991751
Louder with Crowder is unexpectedly good
>>8993021
Nice bait.
ProfRobBob
Heyy vsauce, Michael here
>>8993104
Amazing, I almost feel as if I'm watching one of his videos now! Thanks for the goosebumps.
I like applied science and the dude who keeps bees and sweeps the road for gold
>>8991751
runforthecube
>>8993104 >>8993108
>>8991751
3blue1brown is good. even though he dumbs things down a lot of the time, he still captures the essence pretty well, and still uses more math than most youtube channels.
>>8991751
Periodic Videos
>>8993315
This guy knows
Sixty symbols
space time
>>8991761
>JordanPetersonVideos
>>8993374
problem?
>>8993315
>watching that kike shake uncontrollably because of the genetic inbred mess he is
no thanks
>>8993480
>/sci/
>>8991751
3blue1brown
Calc/DiffEq/LinAlg lectures from MIT:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL590CCC2BC5AF3BC1
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4C4C8A7D06566F38
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEC88901EBADDD980
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE7DDD91010BC51F8
Intro physics lectures from Yale:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFE3074A4CB751B2B
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD07B2225BB40E582
Leonard Susskind advanced physics lectures:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL47F408D36D4CF129
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL701CD168D02FF56F
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD9DDFBDC338226CA
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpGHT1n4-mAvcXwzOIz3dHnGZaQP1LEib
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpGHT1n4-mAuVGJ2E1uF9GSwLsx7p1xtm
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpi18tMShZSAQFNTb8Ji7EgCFP9lXbkOe
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpGHT1n4-mAsmMxmSX0LCaXIXT2PmU85m
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=768E1383EA79C603
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=8BCB4981DD1A0108
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpi18tMShZSBKLugjxRsN8U5MmILu1nBo
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=A2FDCCBC7956448F
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3E633552E58EB230
Intro Abstract Algebra course form Harvard:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLelIK3uylPMGzHBuR3hLMHrYfMqWWsmx5
Intro Real Analysis course:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0E754696F72137EC
ICTP math for advanced math lectures:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-akozxNLMPcMcs0qVvS1VQ/playlists?sort=dd&view=1&shelf_id=0
>>8991751
Any open source college courses
Vsauce and other similar infotainment
The Alternative Hypothesis
Isaac Arthur
>>8991751 >>8995965
Stanford physics lectures
https://youtu.be/pyX8kQ-JzHI?list=PLQrxduI9Pds1fm91Dmn8x1lo-O_kpZGk8
by Leonard Susskind
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Susskind
>>8995983
This.
Stefan Molyneux
>>8996135
numberphile is honestly better than vsauce
>>8996162
numberphile isn't as good as 3blue1brown though. it just shouldn't be below vsauce
>>8991751
>Top Tiers (Above VSauce)
3Blue1Brown, Periodic Videos, PBS Infinite Series, PBS Space Time, Sixty Symbols
>Vsauce Tier
Vsauce, Vsauce2, Vsauce3, Tom Scott, Computerphile, Real Engineering, Isaac Arthur, NASA, NASA JPL, Numberphile,
>Good but Below VSauce Tier
Vsauce, Seeker, Sci Show, Crash Course, Scientific American, Science Channel, SciShow Space, TED Science, Asap SCIENCE, Domain of Science
>Tolerable (Michio Kaku/Neil deGraisse Tyson) Tier
Kurzgesagt, Minute Physics, Vintage Space, Veritasium, Physics Girl, Cold Fusion, Minute Earth, Brain Craft, Explorium, CGP Grey, Big Think
>Nigga What are You Doing Tier
Bill Nye, Life Noggin, Smarter Every Day
>>8996156 >>8996162 >>8996135 >>8996168
>>8996156
numberphile is better than vsauce because, though it rarely goes into much detail, at least tries to explain the essence of problems, whereas vsauce just provides a stream-of-consciousness list of neat-sounding facts
>>8996204
3B1B should be under his own God-tier section for pop math/sci. There really isn't anyone else as good as him in that genre. He actually goes into significant detail in a way normal people can understand (with a small amount of work) and provides excellent visualizations.
>>8993374
Have you not yet attained a balance between chaos and order?
That's fine...none of us have...
>>8996184
Should split the channels in more tiers?
Some Numberphile videos are very good, but other times I feel that they are a bit lacking and vague.
3Blue1Brown is the best Math Channel on Youtube so far followed by PBS Infinite Series.
Sixty Symbols & Computerphile are made by the same Group, but have much more well crafted content than Numberphile
>>8995965 >>8996175
The Open Source Lectures are actually the Elder God Top Tiers.
Because they teach the actual science in Academic Settings by Classes Taught by Renowned Professors
The Courses from MIT, Yale, Stanford, Harvard, etc.
However nobody have such time to watch hours of Lessons.
>>8996175
I listen Pop science to relax before sleep. Not for actual study.
MIT/Harvard/Stanford/Yale Lectures are actually Study.
>>8993089
>Crowder misrepresents links to sources
Fixed that for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEylCS6-hBE&index=34&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNmq4ouWww
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeOZSMrwnYw&t=1s
>>8993021
It's actually unsurprisingly bad.
They're all complete shit.
Pop science channels, academic channels and independently managed academic personnel channels are all plagued with sophism.
Academia has taken a dive this past decade.
>>8996119
Argument man is not /sci/
>>8996175
>Michio Kaku/Neil deGrasse Tyson
>tolerable
Keep everything else the same and just change the triggering category name to "intolerable", and we're good.
>>8993824
His videos suck ass. He is shit at explaining and uses all these unparsable visuals.
>>8997045
The explanations and visuals are fine. You just need to pay attention.
>>8993315
Thoisoi2 - Chemical Experiments!
It's another Chemistry Channel, the only bad thing is the strrrrong Russian Accent, sometimes almost unintelligible.
>>8995981
I cant find the Alternative Hypothesis can someone link me?
c0nc0rdance is pretty neat. Suprised no one has mentioned him yet
>>8991751
>there are other potholer54 fans here
I'm glad I'm not the only one
>>8997943
he's a pretty cool dude who doesnt afraid of anything
>>8991751
Nilered and NurdRage are surprisingly good material for amateur chemistry
>>8998799
can you really be autistic enough to make a response as pointless as this literally three days after the fact
>>8993270
>>8996175
>smarter everyday
They have some cool videos, like the one with water droplets in space.
>>8996231
>the same Group
Harpreet Bedi
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCgncMh0TrCkiiuBH1fcioW8uFO9S_KPE
>>8991751
AK Lectures.
He is basically a psycho that does videos about basic science. He has full videos for all common undergraduate level physics courses and some graduate.
>>8999901 >>8996231
Sixty Symbols, Numberphile & Computerphile have the same producers & they collaborate quite often.
For example the Physicist Phil Moriarty, specialist in Nano Physics appeared in both Sixty Symbols & Computerphile.
https://youtu.be/tWWyAklkYqM
https://youtu.be/xkLAhU74f3s
>>9000900
Haha yeah, too bad he went insane.
>>8991751
I personally love his videos
>>8996175
Despite the name, smarter every day doesn't really market itself as an especially intellectual channel or anything. It's good-natured fun.
>>8999722
t. autist
>Stephan
>Jordan
If brainlets had wings /pol/ would be an airport.
Read some actual /lit/ you dumb faggots.
Good channels:
Siraj raval
Osmosis
Isaac Arthur
Eevblog
>>9000953
Peterson is fine, retard.
>>9000953
>Eevblog
>Siraj raval
Not science: surface-level software engineering and electrical engineering. In fact not even that, just basic electronics and simple high-level programming.
>Isaac Arthur
Random, long-winded speculation. Isn't established science and has no scientific basis either. Mentions some basic physics sometimes but not anything beyond that. It's generalisations on yet-to-exist things from sci fi and the like. I enjoy watching it but not for educational content, for inspiration and imagination.
>Osmosis
Only good mention.
>>8995983
was hoping someone posted this
>>8996175
\thread
Ps: but why is DoS below Vsauce b-baka ?
Not mentioned yet but these guys https://www.youtube.com/user/SocraticaStudios do some pretty good videos on maths topics not typically covered elsewhere on youtube
>>8991751
>potholer54
mah nigga
>>8996175
Can't dispute this.
>>8996175
Spacetime and 3Blue1Brown are too good for this world