[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

kinematic indeterminacy

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 3

File: hinges.jpg (20KB, 910x302px) Image search: [Google]
hinges.jpg
20KB, 910x302px
i hope you understand these symbols that are common in germany


the left hinge has a degree of freedom vertically right?
>>
where are the civil engineers?
>>
those are supposed to be 3 beams by the way connected by hinges and on bearings
>>
>>8981650
So how long have you Germans been dabbling in antigravity? Can't say I'm familiar with the levitation boundary condition.
>>
>>8981709

what? it's a floating bearing anon
>>
>>8981713
You're supposed to draw the rollers.

Also what exactly is your question?
>>
>>8981729

in germany we dont draw the rollers.

my question is if this hinge can move like this. the other hinge cant move right?
>>
File: hinges2.jpg (24KB, 910x302px) Image search: [Google]
hinges2.jpg
24KB, 910x302px
>>8981735

shit forgot pic
>>
>>8981738

of course this is highly exaggerated
>>
>>8981735
>>8981738
Which other hinge?

The fixed hinge would remain in place and the rollers would slide toward it. The articulated joints would also translate laterally.
>>
File: fv.jpg (20KB, 855x365px) Image search: [Google]
fv.jpg
20KB, 855x365px
>>8981765

so the roller would move right even though there is only a vertical force pushing on the hinge?
>>
>>8981782

*move left


im retarded
>>
op here

i think i figured out what the issue is


all those hinge/joint/bearing models just dont work anymore for large displacements/forces
>>
>>8981799
They work, but for large displacementents it becomes a rigid body dynamics problem instead of a statics problem.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.