Studies have shown that there is a time observation difference between small and big objects.
Study:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/sep/16/time-passes-slowly-flies-study
What if, in case of quantum entanglement, the particle we are trying to observe has different/faster perception of time. For that particle, everything is in slow motion. Hence, once observed, it moves to the other possition so quickly and when we observe, it changes its values to counter its previous one. For example, a switch, it can have only one value at a time when interacting with, but can only observe the possition to counter its previous one. Currently it's 1, but then when interacted with, changes the value to 0. and when again interacted, it gets the value 1 which is counter to the previous.
It is the case with Earth and a Blackhole. The structure of a blackhole is quite huge compared what earth is and, if we go down below, compared to a human. Hence for us the time moves faster compared to the blackhole. (Interstaller movie, when while visiting the blackhole's horizon, the time starts moving slowly for them. They entered the blackhole's time observation zone.
Assumption:
1. The assumption I made here is that, we can't exactly tell that we have generated two distinguishable particles. It is possible for one particle to move its own possition so quickly that we can not observe the change and observe it as two different particles.
(Flash TV series, the episode in which the reverse flash and Harrison Wells were seen as two different people. But in the end we knew that they were absolutely one person, he was moving so fast that he was creating two different images of himself. Reverse flash was moving so rapidly because him time perception was too high compared to a normal human being. (Compare it to the flies study shown above). So with this example, we can put a reasonable doubt on whether we can absolutely tell that we have generated two distinguishable particles.)
>>8975388
I didn't bother to read all that shit since you used the words "small" and "big" in the first sentence?
If they're talking about gravitational time dilation, that's not news.
>>8975388
all bullshit, and nonconfirmed except by iss astronauts who support special relativity s an explanation for why we dont have live footage of earth from the moon
I'm not a very well informed person in the field of science and trying to learn a few concepts. Quantum mechanics especially interests me, I've been studying it since last 6 months. This question popped up in the mind. I wouldn't ask if I knew that people here don't actually point out the mistake instead just trash the OP without proper reasoning.
Thank you ^^