>How about an unstoppable mouse? Now most mice can be stopped! You can put a wall in front of them and they can't go through the wall! You can put them in a box! You can stop them! Okay, so we have the notion of a stoppable mouse. Does that we therefore have a notion of an unstoppable mouse? Is that a sort of a necessary flipside to the concept?
How can one man be so based? He has BTFO the entire modern mathematical establishment, but how do we make this more well known? Most people are still unaware of the illogical foundations of modern axiomatics, and in particular the establishment mathematicians are unwilling to adopt the Wildbergian framework.
>>8972105
give me enough decimals and ill tell you there is no such thing as a stoppable mouse
He has the spirit of an unstoppable mouse
What happens if an unstoppable mouse hits an immovable kitten?
>>8972163
berger on suicide watch