>Android calculator

>>8970921
In computer science NUMBER divided by zero is taken to be infinity. It makes so many things easier.

File: 1458293252263.jpg (40KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 960x960px

>computer science
Waste of money for brainlets and will not get you any good return even for MIT students: the degree

>>8970921
Let me translate for everyone

>I am op and I am a plebian at math.

Math PhD master race here.

>>8970956
How's that 300k?

>>8970921
That's true tho

File: Screenshot_20170612-000350.png (50KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1080x1920px

>>8970921
Works on MY machine™

File: Screenshot_20170611-223853.png (99KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1440x2560px

Something's wrong with yours, OP. Either that or it's a shitty photoshop job.

>100 / 0 = ERROR
Well, fuck.
It won't even tell me what the problem is!

It's +/- ∞

Are they brainlets?

>>8970988
-∞ and +∞ are the same

for 100/0 to be infinity, 0 would have to be capable of converging to a whole number.
you cant fucking divide by 0 brainlets

>>8971052
infinity isnt a number anyway, its just a fucking mathematical constant

File: 1488895599219.png (1MB, 1080x1332px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1332px

>>8971055
>mathematical constant
>isnt a number
???

>>8971065
oh shit i guess i spelled wrong and it corrected to constant, but i meant concept

>all these brainlets not knowing the projective real line

100/0 = x
Therefore 100 = x*0
Nothing satisfies x
Simple algebra people

File: Screenshot_20170611-215220.png (70KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1080x1920px

>>8970921
Um excuse me sweetie but ur a liar

File: Screenshot_20170612-022941.png (79KB, 1200x1920px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1200x1920px

Say what?

File: Capture+_2017-06-11-23-31-17.png (93KB, 1440x2392px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1440x2392px

Hey guys can I prove op wrong too

File: Screenshot_20170612-084447.png (42KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 720x1280px

Good bait.

>>8970921
It's worse than that. Try typing in 0^0.

>>8971417
It says 0^0=1 which is true

File: you are gods mistake.jpg (4KB, 153x160px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 153x160px

>>8971008

>>8971008
Then an integral from -inf to inf would always equal zero.

>>8971424
Class what's 0 squared?
0 !!!
What's 0^1?
0 !!!!
What's the square root of 0?
0 !!!!
What's 0^(1/998999888)?
0 !!!!
What's 0^0?
>drool coming from his mouth the class retard >>8971424 enters the room
1 !!!!

>>8971445
nice meme

>>8971445
>implying its retarded
can you back your claim?
[math]\text{Proof that the function }f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\text{ given by:}[/math]
[eqn]f(x) = 0^x[/eqn] [math]\text{Is continuous on }\mathbb{R}[/math]

>>8971432
they are in a riemann sphere

>>8970921
>>8971136
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/36928447

>>8971489
fancy bait

>>8971488
X^0 was deemed to be one because it followed a pattern.
Let"
X^n=r
Where n>0: r >1. As n diverges to infinity so does r.
Where n <0: 0 <r <1 as n diverges to -infinity r converges to 0.
N=0 is abstract mathematics and is said to be 1 as it would follow the pattern.

Here's the pattern for x=0
Where n>0 r is 0.
Where n <0 r is undefined.

0^0 is again abstract mathematics and it's value changes depending on the circumstances. (Like the famous sum of all natural numbers sometimes equaling -1/12)

All you piggots need to learn some basic projective geometry...

File: Screenshot_2017-06-12-15-43-40.png (261KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1440x2560px

best calculator reporting in

>>8972006
What is your calculator?
Mine is ok and gives the same result

Infinity is a Christian concept that has overstayed it's welcome in math. It's a meaningless concept that the field of mathematics would do well to get rid of.

>>8971445
Look piggot. Let me break it down for you. Pay attention.

Do you know what your problem is? You don't know what [math]a^b[/math] even means.

[math]a^b[/math] is the number of functions from [math][b][/math] to [math][a][/math].

This basic definition extends to all cardinal numbers. Why do you think the power set of [math]X[/math] is denoted as [math]2^X[/math]? Yeah. it's because of the basic definition of the operator "^" that I just posted, piggot.

So then, tell me, what is [math]0^0[/math]? In other words, how many functions are there from the empty set to the empty set?

>>8971445
By the way, you fucking retard (and yes this is still me, the guy from >>8972439 )

Hey piggot, what's 0 factorial?

Let me educate you about that too, since you obviously need it.

n! is the number of *bijections* [math]f:[n]\rightarrow[n][/math].

So then, tell me, what is 0 factorial? In other words, how many *bijections* are there from the empty set to the empty set?

>>8972439
>>8972446
based

>>8972446
Listen here you blithering nigger. I said 0^0 CAN be 1 depending on definitions and circumstances.
an example of indeterminate values would be the second answer here:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/714170/what-is-infinity-to-the-power-zero

>>8972439
>>8972446
>Defending axioms with passion
kekkest

>>8970954
You should only ever study code theory. LIterally the best thingever i m nsdajsi je o jkfrei j krjwjwfhwjkfhwejkhwejkwhjkwh

File: Screenshot_20170613-190301.png (70KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1080x1920px

what shitty phones you got

File: Screenshot_20170613-192239.png (33KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 720x1280px

>>8970921
It's true

Leonhard Euler would have agreed with your phone, by the way. Your phone is better at math than you

>>8973662
you-ler?

File: 1484742436799.jpg (37KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 720x540px

>>8970921

>>8971444
But on the real projective line it does
also
>implying integrating over all of R is "integrating from -inf to inf"

>>8970921
Wow, it implicitly takes the limit? That's really fucking cool!

>>8973662
u live in spain

>>8970921
I guess they use the extended reals.

>>8971107
do you mean the extended real line?

>>8970921
what phone do you use

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory

>>8970921
>Windows calculator
>1^(1/3)=0.333...

File: ExtendedRealNumberProj_1000.gif (3KB, 285x280px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 285x280px

>>8970921
But, that's just correct.
>inb4 some pleb talks about +-infinity
fuck off