Is pic related a good choice?

>>8965218
Yes.

>>8965218
no, literally pick any other book

File: 1481600141424.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>8965232
>explain

>>8965237
amazon.com exists, you can read criticism there

File: 1493269234745.gif (891KB, 325x252px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 325x252px

>>8965241

>>8965247
obviously you're already convinced it's a good choice since you didn't ask the guy who said yes to explain, so just read it and stop being a brainlet making threads about textbooks you'll likely never open the pdf of

>>8965218
What's your background and what are you looking for?

>>8965218
Yes. Simmons is a nice book for most undergrads. Easy but still much better than Stewart.

Books like Apostol, Spivak & Courant are harder, & indicated to those seriously want to major in Math or Theoretical Physics.

All Math Majors, Some Physicists & the best Engineers definitely will need to go deeper & study Upper Division / Graduate Analysis (the Theory behind Calculus)

>>8965218
>Is pic related a good choice?
What - bookbinding? Tedious, but rewarding to the soul.
- Math? You'd have to become a professor (like working with children?) or statistician (in an office, sedentary all the time).
- Astronomer? Few job opportunities, always begging for funding.
- Builder of orreries? Kinda like bookbinding, but much more exacting.
- Book photographer? Umm... boring. Can't imagine it's very rewarding on any level.
What are you asking, OP?

>>8965218

It has no infinitesimals.