Is it scientifically possible to be bisexual?

>>8963946
Are you insecure?

>>8963946
not for you, OP. not for you.

>>8963964
y-yes.

>>8963972
just accept you are a faggot

>>8963946
Yes, you were sexually or otherwise abused.
Best thing to do is kill yourself.

>>8964000
No

>>8963946
What kind of question is this? Of fucking course it is possible. There are bisexuals, therefore they must be scientifically possible.

t. 1-2 on the Kinsey-scale

>>8963946
Bisexual yes.
Bigender No.

It's impossible to be Bigender because chromosomes.

>>8964280

This sort of experiential reasoning in our cases often does not suffice to convince those who are not wired as we are. I had a very bright jewish psychology roommate whose personal view, after full training in psychology and specializing with queer people, was nevertheless that male bisexuality is meaningfully non-existent and an aberrent confusion.

t. male bisexual whose fondest wish is to keep one of each

File: 1478930261782.jpg (15KB, 332x256px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 332x256px

>>8964326
I've never once seen trannies use the excuse of the redundancy of the Y chromosome in defense of genders being "fluid"

If they got the biology crowd on their side or had an ounce of knowledge about proteomics/genomics they'd have some serious power at their hands with the amount of arbitrary, vague and hard to explain shit in genomics.

once you suck dick, you're a dicksucker