Someone explain wheres error
>>8952475
sqrt(ab)!=sqrt(a)sqrt(b) when a or b is neg I guess
[math]\sqrt{(-1)(-1)}=1\neq-1=i\cdot{i}[/math]
Edgar Allen Poe knows dick about math, that's your problem.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/49169/why-sqrt-1-times-1-neq-sqrt-12
there's an interesting article on euler's misuse of the product rule in Elements of Algebra, too
http://www.martinezwritings.com/m/Euler.html
>>8952487
But
[math] \sqrt{(-1)(-1)} = \sqrt{-1} \cdot \sqrt{-1} = \i \cdot \i [/math]
>>8952487
No, it's a problem with the formulation of [math]i[/math]. Wildberger was right.
Example:
[math]3=\sqrt{9}=\sqrt{3\cdot3}=\sqrt{3}\cdot\sqrt{3}=3[/math]
>>8952508
First equal sign isn't valid, brainlet.
>[math]1=\sqrt{(-1)(-1)}=\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1}=-1[/math]
This is you being a brainlet.
>>8952477
literally just this
nothing more to it
Bro... -1 x -1= 1....
>>8952518
>3=3
Really showed me there. Learn what a principal root is, fagtron.
>>8952528
The OP image is a completely valid decomposition of 1. I just did something analagous and it worked while his example didn't.
>>8952533
>I just did something analagous
Your father should have worn a condom.
Also (2^0)(2^0) = (2^0)^2 which simplifies to 2^0...exponents multiply when they're in brackets like that
>>8952475
that's what happens what you make up something to solve equations with no solutions.
>muh i isn't made up
>muh sqrt-1 isn't gibberish
>>8952475
Both -1 and 1 are equal to Sqrt1, then the equation has 2 possible outcomes, 1 being 2=1+1, which is true, and the second being 2=1-1, which is false
>>8952561
square root of -1 you stupid brainlet
>>8952533
>The OP image is a completely valid decomposition of 1
No it is not. The 4 fourth equals sign is false.
[math] \sqrt{ - 1} \cdot \sqrt{ -1 } = e^{i \frac{\pi}{2}}\cdot e^{i \frac{\pi}{2}} = e^{\pi} = -1 [/math]
while
[math]\sqrt{-1 \cdot -1} = 1 = e^{i \cdot 0} [/math]
It becomes clear when you define the square root function precisely for complex numbers.
For eg, if you define it as Sqrt: re^(it) -> sqrt(r)*e^(it/2), where sqrt() is the usual square root function for non-negative reals and t lies in [0, 2pi), then Sqrt(a*b) = Sqrt(a) * Sqrt(b) only when the sum of their angles is in [0, 2pi)
>>8952578
good job looking stupid
>>8952583
What are you talking about?
>>8952477
That's a funny identity you've got there, bud.
>>8952477
There's a bit more to it but that's the idea
>>8952475
>(((imaginary))) numbers
>>8952585
It's just a brainlet sperging out.
[math]1^2=-1^2[/math]
[math]1=-1[/math]
look everyone I broke math xd
>>8952477
what does factorial has to do with anything?
>>8952648
!= is a notation for not equal sign
The square root of -1 can also be -i
So, take other as i and other as -i and you get -i*i=1.
You have to remember that square roots have always two solutions which can cumulate.
>>8952657
Not for human communication. You use it only when talking to compilers, interpreters and software """engineers""".
>>8952657
that would be =/=, or since we have tex commands here, [math]\neq[/math].
>>8952660
this
>>8952475
>2^0 = -1
Wtf
>>8952834
that i^2 dumbass
>>8952475
Sqrt (-1) actually has two values: i and -i, so, technically, [math]i \neq \sqrt {-1} [/math]
>>8952523
I'm not arguing there isn't a problem, I just understand why it works for positive integers but not negative ones.
[math]2 = \sqrt{4} = \sqrt{2 \cdot 2} = \sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2} = 2[/math]
[math] 2 = \sqrt{4} = \sqrt{-2 \cdot -2} \neq \sqrt{-2} \cdot \sqrt{-2} = -2 [/math]
What I don't understand is why the equals sign isn't valid. An answer to that question from your part would warrant you to call others brainlets. Until then, I will assume that like most people on /sci/, you're just larping.
>>8952841
That rule, sqrt(ab)=sqrt(a)sqrt(b) is valid only for positive real a and b.
>>8952897
I imagine it is, but is there a rationale as to why? Otherwise it's just a stipulation, which is not ideal.
>>8952841
>I understand why it works for positive integers but not negative ones
>I don't understand is why the equals sign in [math]\sqrt{(-1)(-1)}=\sqrt{-1}\cdot\sqrt{-1}[/math] isn't valid
Pick one.
>>8952907
typo. I meant 'don't understand' for both.
>>8952839
Where is the I?
>>8952920
Okay thanks!
Brainlets were a mistake.
>>8952475
i.i does not equal sqrt(-1)(-1) if you multiply the negative ones together first before you square root
>>8952902
Yes, because if you allow it with negative numbers and complex ones, you get the contradiction 1 = -1. You are familiar with proof by contradiction right?
>>8953017
Fair point.
>>8953126
>>8953126
>[math](-i)^2=1[/math]
>the absolute state of this brainlet
>>8953126
>The sqrt is defined as a function and there is only one value for each square root.
Square root is a multifunction, you brain dead cretin. Stop posting and kys yourself.
>>8952527
Brainlet boy. i =/= -1, i^2 = -1
>>8953180
That's clearly not what anon meant in his post about there being two roots for sqrt -1.
>>8953184
Nope. The sqrt of a number is always the positive root.
What youre thinking of are solutions of the form y = sqrt (x). Clearly, x = +- sqrt (y) but the sqrt refers specifically to |sqrt (y)|.
How does it feel knowing you aren't fit to teach elementary operations?
>>8953126
>The sqrt is defined as a function and there is only one value for each square root.
NO, IT IS NOT
the [math]\sqrt{i} = -1[/math] is the biggest cancer I have ever seen holy fuck
>>8952475
can just take the square root of individual terms to get rid of the entire square root function