What did Oppenheimer mean by this?
>>8952369
>The sentence, enigmatic and incomprehensible at the time, was actually an allusion to ancient Hindu texts that describe an apocalyptic catastrophe that doesn’t correlate with volcanic eruptions or other known phenomena. Oppenheimer, who avidly studied ancient Sanskrit, was undoubtedly referring to a passage in “The Bhagavad Gita” that describes a global disaster caused by “an unknown weapon, a ray of iron.”
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/23630-ancient-atomic-bombs/
>>8952369
dinosaurs had nuke
FACT
>>8952380
>when /sci/ goes /x/
Come on now
>>8952380
>from splitting atoms to colliding them
hmmm
>>8952380
>tfw into /sci/ shit and also study sanskrit in my free time
w-what the fuck?
>>8952446
>wasting time reading poo-in-loo mythology
yeah wtf
This quote sounds made up. Never trust a quote which purports to be taken from a classroom setting.
>>8952451
>being too brainlet to learn all earth's history
I feel sorry for you
I thought /sci/ was smart
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astra_(weapon)
>The weapon was also believed to cause severe collateral damage. The land where the weapon was used became barren, and all life in and around that area ceased to exist. Both men and women became infertile. There was also a severe decrease in rainfall with the land developing cracks, as in a drought. The Brahmastra is mentioned in the epics and Vedas as a weapon of last resort and was never to be used in combat.
Sound familiar?
Everything you know is a lie
>>8952471
In Hinduism, the universe cycles through creation and destruction with only Brahman remaining consistent through them all.