Which dinosaurs had feathers?

>>8944542
The feathered ones.

Anyone else ever feel like they kill threads just by posting in them? I'll ask a question or offer a proposed solution to a problem and then thread is dead. No matter chatter or traffic after that. I wonder if I'm just that stupid or something.
>Totally off topic, just felt like venting and seeing if anyone can relate.

File: nodosaur-fossil-canadian-mine-face.adapt.1900.1.jpg (324KB, 1900x1268px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1900x1268px

>>8944544
any sauropods? What about Trex?

>>8944548
hang on my sons crying.

but yeah I know how you feel. Insanity and controversy sells. not logical solutions starring everybody in the face.

File: fluffyt.jpg (34KB, 540x313px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 540x313px

>>8944550

I'm pretty sure it's basically everything raptor-like that had feathers and virtually nothing else. So basically if you ran around on two legs with two bitchy little arms and had a tail for balance, you had feathers.

T-rex, velociraptor, other stuff that I don't know the name of.

I'm quoting a fact that I don't even recall the source for though.

File: 170530-sketchy-dog-mn-0940_eec783453b475b0a69328af6eb7cf755.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg (172KB, 912x1000px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 912x1000px

>tfw archeopteryx

>>8944550
T.rex most definitely
Sauropods maybe, up until very recently they were believed to be distant cousins of theropods but now there is some doubt which means they may or may not have had feathers.
Then again there is evidence of proto feathers going back to the earliest dinosaur common ancestor.

>>8944542
None of them.

They had proto-feathers which are not actually feathers.

>>8947802
Then how did ptaradactyl fly? Idiot

>>8946711
http://www.shadbase.com/wallstreet-statue/

>>8944548
I often don't bother responding to someone, even if they really deserve a (you)

>>8947813
I don't think they can be considered dinosaurs

>>8945765

I really really hope t-rex actually looked like that