Anyone read this book? How was it?

>how not to be wrong
Find specific, SPECIFIC empirical evidence before stating any conclusions.

File: 30658[2].jpg (22KB, 306x500px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 306x500px

>>8944392
>how not to be wrong

i've seen something like this before

I just marathonned this book

Let me know what i thunk of it

When you feel up to it

Well, the author isn't wrong...

>>8944392

dogshit dude, (((Ellenberg))) simply compiled, edited, and published the comments of the Occupy Democrats Facebook page. I don't think there was a single equation or proof in there.

File: 1487446566869.jpg (46KB, 542x535px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 542x535px

>>8944398
>empirical evidence
an oxymoron that you turn into a spook

>>8944524
the fuck?

>>8944524
>stirnerfag
>illiterate
Like pottery. It's a pleonasm, not oxymoron.

>>8944392
Yeah. It's ok, but he mostly writes about basic calculus, statistics and some history

>>8944392
>how to jew your way around everything
>Ellenberg
Figures.

>>8944401
lol

>>8944392
>How To Write A Profitable Book
>By Shlomo Shekelberg

instant bestseller

>>8944392
the title is very very dumb, but I liked the book, is probably the closest thing to a "pop math" book there is.

>>8945444
sad but true. we are saturated with shit unfortunately.