Lebesgue integration is a meme
>>8939018
Almost everything is a meme.
never heard of lebonese integration, is that in calc iv?
>>8939018
is this another "I don't understand infinitesimality" thread?
> super duper thin rectangles
>>8939093
>lebonese integration
topkek
Isn't this just a reconfigured retrospective Tai's method
>>8939233
>Tai's method
>>8939018
>not using aesthetically superior diagonal rectangles
>>8939115
>>8939018
>Not using Daniell integration
Formal integration is a meme anyway. All the interesting and worthwhile integration is done numerically.
>>8939018
Except for the fact it is way more useful because it can be formulated on any measure space.
>>8939111
So many doesn't seem to get it, I really don't understand the difficulty with it.
>>8939329
This, if you care about analytic solutions you're an autist with no skin in the game.
>it's 2017 and there isn't a method to exactly measure the area under a curve
>>8939329
every valid numerical technique is justified using formal integration. The error bounds are proved using formal integration.
>>8939018
>not using john gabriel's integration formulas.
>>8939384
And how you define area under a curve without integrals
>>8939445
What kind of idiot needs to have defined what's the area under a curve? Unless he's literally blind.
>>8939384
>2017
uh anon tai's method was discovered in 1994
>>8939602
>doing math of the 21st century with math of the -4 century
OP is your name Jason?
>>8939665
no it's not, sorry NSA
>>8939354
There's a reason why the greeks didn't develop calculus, playing with infinite and infinitesimals is not trivial. I'm almost concluding Real Analysis I and I'm not completely convinced of the meaning of a derivative.
Algebra on the other hand is 1+1 for me. I envy those who have an easy time with analysis.
Calculus is a meme