ITT: jargon that only makes sense in your field
I'll start.
>High five display a strong ping-pong fingerprint
>The quick action of sonic hedgehog is essential for development
>Assume
>clearly
>obviously
and all other synonyms thereof
>>8938334
Gneiss cleavage
>>8938334
Mole bio?
>>8938334
>Internet of things
pi
>get real
i
>act rational
>>8938470
jup. Biochemistry in particular.
>>8938334
Imaginary numbers are complex.
Real numbers aren't natural or rational.
etc
>>8938334
Blowing up points on a plane.
>>8938334
>monkey board
>tool pusher
>roughneck
>monkey board
>>8938334
>I think that sand anchor is set webbing-up, so we better get some of that line laundry off, then the lifters. Pilots are probably OK if somebody locks in. Glad it's not a stack of PL maxis!. Grab some pulldown straps everybody.
Admittedly not science field...
>>8938628
You in show business?
>>8938334
I always smile a little, when I read stuff like "the slaves should kill their children at the end of their life"
Spooky action at a distance
Oh wait it doesnt make sense at all
>>8938672
oilfield
> tight hole
>blow out
>fish
The fluid structure interaction causes a hardening behavior
"""""systems"""""
>systems of oppression
>control systems
>society systems
It pains me when sociology majors misuse our terms to describe emergent non-systemized behavior. I can respect the word when it describes bureaucratic systems, corporate systems, systems of government, hierarchical systems, any system that can actually be enumerated or quantified.
You ask these people who exactly is doing the oppression, you get an answer like "men," so then you ask exactly which men, and they're usually lost. If they do name a person, you can ask what exactly they did, and if some serious shit was done by that person, ask about the rate at which this happens, because 100% of the time, behavior like that is the exception, not the rule that they claim it to be. Still haven't found a woman from the last 50 years who didn't get a job position solely because she was a woman.
>>8938334
And what of robotnikin?
>>8938334
>The chocolate on the chocolate milk has measure zero.
>>8938757
fucking privileged asshole
you're part of the problem! (that's why you can't see it)