Do you know where can I get nice notes about magnetic fields?
>>8936485
Your right hand.
>>8936486
This guy speaks the truth
I is the intensity
B the magnetic field
F the Laplace force
>>8936494
Amazing. It's as if our hand were intelligently designed to represent magnetic fields.
This
F=BILSinθ
>>8936485
read
sticky
>>8936485
>I have an physics exam
lucky it's not an English exam
>>8936496
Exactly
>>8936523
I initially wrote "an exam". I forgot to remove the "n" when I introduced the "physics"
>>8936496
Atheists BTFO
>>8936513
this tbqhwy
I habe a guestion..
Why is the direction of the magnetic field directed in this way and not in the opposite?
I asked myself this years ago, but could not find an answer with google.
>>8937272
That's an interesting question...
>>8937272
There is no underlying principle behind the electromagnetic field that we know. As to this date, it's just because nature said so.
>>8936555
I hope your English teacher understands
>>8936485
The Feynman lectures are pretty awesome if you're already comfortable with vector calculus: http://feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
just study electric field and boost youre frame
Guru et al: Electromagnetic field theory fundamentals
libgen.io is a website to download books for free
>>8937272
For the same reason torque does the same thing
The way I like to think about it, it's just how vectors work
>>8937272
The torque response is mostly right but only in that torque and magnetism are both defined this way. It just has to do with convention - if you take a negative test charge, for example, you can actually use the same rules but just with your left hand. So it's arbitrary.
>>8936485
My diary, desu
>>8936485
Check out the Seinfeld physics lectures
>>8937272
The only way we can compare magnetic fields is with other magnetic fields. North and South are relative to each other. The important take away is that if current were reversed, the field would be too.
>>8938579
The only difference between the electric and magnetic field is the observer.