What do you think are the prospects for causality given that

File: Higgs.png (533KB, 1276x1476px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 1276x1476px

or this

File: Blackheath.png (106KB, 468x306px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 468x306px

or this one

>>8934729
>>8934731
Pls fuck off.

File: notevenbait.jpg (33KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 625x626px

>>8934731
>or this
Oh no, not again....

File: CageCorrelation.png (36KB, 660x230px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 660x230px

>>8934729
>What do you think are the prospects for causality given that both of these two correlations can be further correlated with the development of the theory of infinite complexity and the attendant modified cosmological model?
>>8934733
>or this one

I personally prefer this other correlation (r=0.666)

File: Centcom.png (87KB, 510x908px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 510x908px

>>8934729
Shocking Report Finds U.S. Military Consistently "Distorted, Suppressed, Or Substantially Altered" ISIS-Related Intel
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-14/shocking-report-finds-us-military-consistently-distorted-suppressed-or-substantially

File: C76n2.jpg (67KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 640x640px

>>8934750
If I understand you correctly, you mean to say that you prefer it because there is no underlying logical connection behind your chart but the underlying connection implied by my chart, a technological breakthrough due to an unexpected advance in theoretical physics, is very much logical. I prefer my suggested correlation because, in fact, the dynamical mechanism of correlation is so logical that technological innovation is used as a textbook example for unexpected market shifts.

>>8934762
>the underlying connection implied by my chart, a technological breakthrough due to an unexpected advance in theoretical physics, is very much logical
An experimental technology produces a drop of oil prices of 50%..... Yes.... Of course.... That's the only explanation....

File: 170519-axe-space-weapon-tease_vx1fuh.jpg (318KB, 1480x833px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1480x833px

A trio of mysterious Russian government satellites startled space experts when, shortly after blasting into low orbit between 2013 and 2015, they began dramatically changing their orbits, demonstrating a rare degree of maneuverability for small spacecraft.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/05/19/russias-killer-satellites-re-awaken

>2013
>2015

File: Capture.png (349KB, 594x252px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 594x252px

>>8934782
>That's the only explanation....
Thread asks "What do you think of the prospects for this specific interpretation?"