MBTI

File: ro8bp4w.jpg (4KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 225x225px

>>8930149
No, it doesn't.

File: 1467220921618.jpg (70KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 500x376px

MBTI is bullshit, it only becomes midly psychological if you try to use cognitive functions instead of a horoscope quiz.
Big 5 is better but you can't make le quirky tumblr charts with those.

[spoiler]Entp here, Ne and Ti are a scientist's tools[/spoiler]

>>8930283
Didn't know /sci/ doesn't have spoilers. I should've assumed that.

>>8930149
I always score INTJ-A
There is nothing wrong with categorizing people based on responses, but the flavor text is as bad as horoscopes.

File: 1482948851838.jpg (2MB, 2864x3448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2864x3448px

INTP-T here

Feels good, you brainlet plebs

File: 400.jpg (44KB, 427x395px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 427x395px

>ENFP-T
Am I a brainlet?

File: 1484987436560.jpg (205KB, 1500x1281px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1500x1281px

>>8930688
T in all cases is worse than A.
INTJ-A master race reporting in.
>>8930643
Correct brother, but do not succumb to self deprecation.
>>8930883
Yes
>>8930283
>>8930235
>People dissatisfied on a Freudian level with their results on a Freud-tier exam...
Though, if your percentages in each category are low, it could be your brain hasn't processed enough "data" from environmental responses to figure out how it should react.

>>8930688
This really sums up how cancerous MBTI is. How can anyone read this shit without cringing?

INTP master race reporting in. INTPs like myself are so logical, we don't even believe in MBTI.

>>8930149
Not really, but I find function theory as an interesting way to define Thinking, Feeling, Intuition and Sensing and I guess it would be better to measure them instead of encapsulating yourself into 16 types.

Like, I think I use a lot Ni, Ti, Te, Ne, Fi and Se while a lot less Si and Fe

On MBTI tests I get INTJ

>>8930643
That's NERIS Type Indicator, based on MBTI but not the same shit - it measures your tendencies on dualities instead of cognitive functions

basically the modern astrological star sign. based in arbitrary subjective reasoning and is completely meaningless, and there's no standard way to test for it either.

>>8930643
>>8930688
>>8930883
>>8931232
>>8931236
all of these people are pseuds.

>>8931282
ha! I was only pretending to be retarded

>>8930149
>Does MBTI has any scientific merit?

No. You might as well ask about our horoscope, MBTI has been BTFO by every single researcher who has investigated it.
http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf

>>8931305

Pretending to be retarded is, itself, retarded.

>>8931232
Why not just use your star sign?

>>8930688
What the fuck is happening in that picture.

Also why INTJ and ENTJ have the same character?