>assume

I love these threads

>>8928433
>let
No, I will not let

If and only if

>>8928433
>Now,

>do
Don't.

This completes the proof.

>[math]f\left( x \right)[/math] is a function

>[math] \mathfrak{Thenceforth} [/math]

File: 1488404753015.jpg (107KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 640x640px

>think

>Quod erat demonstrandum

>as required

>furthermore

>>8928536
>black square

>>8928540
more like
>[math] \square [/math]

>>8928433
>Hence

There is literally nothing wrong with any of these.

>notice

>>8928536
>>8928540
>>8928543
the late Paul Sally, who taught in the math department at the University of Chicago for many years, literally signed his proofs with a little pirate face.

>>8928433

>maths

Assume I love these threads.
>let
No, I will not let "if and only if"
>Now, do
Don't. This completes the proof.

f(x) is a function, thenceforth think.
Quod erat demonstrandum, as required.
Furthermore, black square, more like [math]\square[/math].

Hence, there is literally nothing wrong with any of these.
Notice the late Paul Sally, who taught in the math department at the University of Chicago for many years, literally signed his proofs with a little pirate face.

This is remarkably coherent so far.

>>8928566
justify these
>>8928518
>>8928519
>>8928536
>>8928537
>>8928585

>>8928594
Someone mail this to Wildburger

File: ooh.jpg (15KB, 480x534px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x534px

>>8928594
fucking collective poetry

>>8928594
Next episode: /sci/ proves P = NP one sentence per post.

>>8928433
>we

>Apparently

>the

>Thus,

>>8928874
>∴

File: be patient.jpg (26KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 720x720px

>hence
>we can rewrite the above as
>which is true by (1) and (2)
>this implies
>which is a contradiction

>definition

>we see

>tfw can't write a proof without using half of these

File: 1485420006055.jpg (22KB, 360x336px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 360x336px

>it follows

File: le rigour.png (59KB, 342x318px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 342x318px

>complain about rigor in this thread
>criticize a black woman for the lack thereof in another

Make up your god damn mind /sci/.

>>8928964
what's this thread got to do with rigour anon?

> [math]\forall[/math]

>[math] \Rightarrow [/math]

>>8928964
what are you, a rigor lover?

>I
Narcissism ruined science

File: funny-frog-meme-feels-good-man.png (127KB, 292x300px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 292x300px

>>8929262
>tfw all proofs in your language use "we", "let's" etc

>>8929219
Math was hard enough with just letters and numbers. But now they're adding upside down letters? Fuck that.

>>8928964
>criticize a black woman for trying to mix her ideology into mathematics.

>>8929262
>the reader

File: yukari_disgust.png (29KB, 287x201px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 287x201px

>it is straightforward to check that the following diagram is commutative

>>8930004
>by naturality,

>>8928433
>consider

You should consider suicide instead you faggot math problem

>the obvious map

File: well.jpg (71KB, 584x438px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 584x438px

>>8928433
>well
This isn't about farming you dumb dumb

>>8928756
dP/dt=baNP - dP


>brainlet report

*flashbacks to proof class*
*initiating flight or fight response*

>>8930004
>>8930008
god damn it these

>>8928561
>or otherwise

>(why?)

>>8930442
holy fuck

>>8930442
>(check this!).

>trivial

>tedious but straightforward

>>8928433
>":)" to mark a point in a proof.
>(exercise)
>more exactly ...
>writing [math]\land,\lor,\exists, \forall,\Rightarrow[/math] during text instead of writing out the words
>obviously ...
>calculate, qed.

File: autism hat.jpg (23KB, 326x326px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 326x326px

>>8930997
>writing ∧,∨,∃,∀,⇒ during text instead of writing out the words
>tfw I like to do this, but my professors don't want it

>>8931066
Your professors are correct.

>>8928513
This one actually pisses me off too

>>8928543
was that necessary?

>>8930997
>writing mathematical text using mathematical notation
well that surely sucks

>>8931066
Anyone who doesn't use symbolic logic notation is a pleb. It's so crystal clear. I hate it when textbooks dance around it

File: tmp_17698-1493357049973197746863.png (158KB, 666x607px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 666x607px

>As any non brainlet can plainly see,

>>8931066
>>tfw I like to do this, but my professors don't want it
My professor is actually doing it himself occasionally.
"That's why /exists...".

[math] \forall x \in X, \exists y \in X \ni x = y [/math]

>given

>>8928433
>think
fuck off cunt i dont want to think

File: image.jpg (17KB, 180x233px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 180x233px

>>8929253

>suppose

>ergo

>>8930997
I do this because I get enjoyment out of writing cryptic symbols that plebs don't understand

>>8928964
>rigor

File: adfbdfb.jpg (18KB, 182x194px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 182x194px

>>8928433
>clearly

File: bakana.png (301KB, 732x442px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 732x442px

>add

File: areerere.png (270KB, 590x542px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 590x542px

>minus

>>8928536
i thought it was
quite easily done

File: 1436364595620.gif (706KB, 410x350px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 410x350px

>>8930442
>>8930687
i groan whenever i see these