I will construct a bijection from the open interval [math](0,1)\subseteq{R}[/math] to [math]\mathbb{N}[/math]. It works as follows:
Let [math]x\in (0,1)\subseteq\mathbb{R}[/math]You give me the number of decimal digits [math]d[/math] needed to represent [math]x[/math], and I will give you the interval in [math]\mathbb{N}[/math] it appears on. This interval will have the exact number of natural numbers as the number of possible reals that require [math]d[/math] digits to represent (thus bijection).
[math]d=1[/math]: [math]x\in [0, 10^1)\subseteq\mathbb{N}[/math]
[math]d=2[/math]: [math]x\in [10^1, 10^3)\subseteq\mathbb{N}[/math]
[math]d=3[/math]: [math]x\in [10^3, 10^6)\subseteq\mathbb{N}[/math]
[math]d=4[/math]: [math]x\in [10^6, 10^10)\subseteq\mathbb{N}[/math]
...
What about infinite decimals
>>8923897
kek
>>8923897
What about infinite naturals. Infinity aint no shit nigga
>>8923991
They are different infinities
>>8924010
t. Cantor
bump for btfo cantor
>>8923850
Deeply retarded post. You haven't even defined what any of the numbers maps to. But an attempt to define a bijection for any of those intervals will fail because there are only NINE one-digit numbers on (0,1): .1, .2, .3, .4,... .9.
While there are TEN natural numbers in the interval [0,10): 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... 9.
>>8924561
blah blah off by one error fug off
>>8923850
Firstly you didn't define any function, secondly at no point you demonstrated that anything is bijective, thirdly, you appear to be defining a function between R and something like P(N)???? which appears to be unrelated to what yo wanted to show, fourthly your Latex is awful, fifthly you are trying to show something which is wrong.