Quantom immortality. Is it real?

>>8920991
No.

Impossible to test.

>>8920991
isnt it necessary if many-worlds is correct?

>>8921016
every one that dies of old age has achieved "quantum immortality"

>>8920991

If it does, it doesn't matter, because all those other possibilities are happening to versions of you that aren't from your perspective and phenomenon that cannot even be observed, let alone used in any conceivable way, are phenomenon that are not worth thinking about.

I think there was an ancient philosopher who posited that the planets let out musical notes as they traveled, but humans couldn't hear or detect them because they lived naturally with them their whole lives, like a natural musk you eventually stop noticing- but if the phenomenon cannot be proven or observed, does it even matter if it exists at all?

>>8920991
the many worlds interpretation is bullshit

of course I cant back that up because there is no way to actually prove what the correct interpretation actually it.

I am skeptical of pilot waves and don't like some of the implications of Copenhagen.

stupid question, never ask it again

>>8921011
Killing yourself is a way to test it

>>8920991
It's fucking retarded

>>8921016
That would imply many-worlds is correct. Which in all likelihood it is not.

>>8921230
well then what do you prefer. you have to pick something

>>8921345
Isn't it the most popular interpretation among physicists after Copenhagen?

>>8921352
Yes. The tards here don't like it because they don't understand it, they just think it goes "hey many worlds lmao let's build an interpretation around that idea." It's much more nuanced than that, and was originally called universal wavefunction theory. Many worlds is not a starting point, it is a consequence.

>>8921360
There may be infinite universes, but determinism rules out the possibility that they're different. Like "ayy a universe where Hitler got into art school lmao" or "Lee Harvey Oswald missed Kennedy" would never have happened