>Proof: Omitted.
>>8904908
>we'll leave the rather tedious development of this equations to the reader
>>8904908
>Proof: Omitted.
>Proof: Easy
>>8904908
>Proof: similar to [theorem 100 pages back]
>Proof: Think.
>Proofs:
[eqn]I:= [z\mapsto z]:Z\to Z[/eqn]
[eqn]B:=[x\mapsto y\mapsto z\mapsto x(y(z))]:(Y\to X)\to(Z\to Y)\to Z\to X[/eqn]
[eqn]C:=[x\mapsto y\mapsto z\mapsto x(z)(y)]:(Z\to Y\to X)\to Y\to Z\to X[/eqn]
[eqn]W:=[y\mapsto z\mapsto y(z)(z)]:(Z\to Z\to Y)\to Z\to Y[/eqn]
[eqn]K:=[z\mapsto y\mapsto z]:Z\to Y\to Z[/eqn]
>>8904908
>Proof: Calculate!
Proof: as exercise to reader.
>Proof: It is obvious
>>8905831
>Proof of theorem 100 pages back: left as an exercise.
>Proof: Check using Tai's method
>>8906666
>>8906668
>no answers to problems in the book
HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW IF I LEARNT THE MATERIAL CORRECTLY YOU FUCKING DOUCHBAGS?!
>>8906709
Life is too short to hold the hands of brainlets.
>>8906731
Books are time irrelevant.
>>8906739
Somebody has to put in the time to write them.
>>8906742
He's paid to write a book. It's very unscientific to omit proof.
>>8906754
The proof is an exercise for a reason. You need to be able to figure it out if you want to learn. The book is a "textbook" and not a "reference book."
>>8906737
But it does look easy, anon.
>>8906865
Yep just unpack the definitions!