Describe the length of a second without referencing something physical
1/60th the time it takes for a minute to pass.
This long.
The time it takes for OP to suck a dick.
That's like describing your mom without referencing a fat hairy hooker covered in butter.
>define something without using the definition
>>8878713
[math]one\;second,\;where\;"second"\;is\;a\;unit\;measuring\;a\;time\;whose\;length\;is\;defined\;via\;a\;mutual\;understanding\;between\;the\;reader\;of\;this\;post\;and\;its\;writer[/math]
It's an arbitrary measurement of the passing of time.
>>8878713
Too long. We have no hope of being able to simulate molecules to the 1 second time scale.
>>8878713
>describe the length
>without referencing something physical
>>8878713
The length of a second is always shorter than the length of a first.
The length of the first second defines a second for the first time in seconds.
>On a second thought, the length of a second is aproximated by thoughts about the length of time between the first second and the second second.
Oh fuuuuc guys what about this?
Light is in a quantum field.
Fields are mathematical structures.
Just say its the geometric form of the hamiltonian to exchange expectstion values. Ahat about that?
>>8878713
The duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.
>>8879043
They might change it to Strontium later
Better question: describe the length of a second without using the letters 'a' and 'e'.
Go.
>>8879358
Sixty of it is 526,000th of this rock's sun orbit.
>>8878713
>describer something physical without using any physical terms
"No."
>>8879358
On Scond
>>8879358
1 2nd
>>8879040
>fields are mathematical structures
>magnets aren't physical, they're just maths
>>8879358
[math]=\frac{1}{2.592×10^6}[/math] of how long OP is sucking guys off down by his town's disgusting truckstop, monthly.
>>8880177
Do you make videos on youtube?