>a particle, or substance, can attach itself to air (oxygen, nitrogen, etc)
>these particles can form a bond and travel through air
>this bond (not sure if covalent or ionic, i'm not very smart) can be directed in a certain distance
>we now have the basis for teleportation
>the attaching particle is in the form of a firework (in the sense that it can grow and expand once activated into something else)
>lets take the example of guiness
>the guiness process can be shrunk to this firework form
>travel through air
>once activated, turn into real guiness
>i can send drinks across the bar without moving my glass
This is surely possible one day guys?
you do realize how fucking complicated making something like that would be and how not fucking worth it would be?
> can be directed in a certain distance
what?
>we now have the basis for teleportation
Do we?
>>8876277
>once activated, turn into real guiness
kekekekek wtf m8
Well well well
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2643332/Beam-Scientists-sat-teleportation-possible-transfer-atoms.html
>>8876277
>Has anyone else thought of this first?
I am fairly certain that the answer to that is "no."
>>8876277
I'll do you one better.
1. Isolate the source of conciousness
2. Deconstruct atomic structure of body while leaving source of consciousness intact
3.Transfer deconstructed atoms of body alongside secured consciousness at light speed
4. Reconstruct said body atomically with said consciousness intact.
>>8876304
are you talking about literally throwing shit across a bar. or attaching each molecule in guiness to a air molecule and 'sending it across the bar'.
That's not teleportation anon. just a really complicated and unnecesary way of throwing things.
>>8876393
The former. Maybe it isn't, but to normies it is.
>>8876397
*latter, fuck.
>>8876317
that's different- quantum entanglement is when two or more particles retain quantum properties similar to each other, even when separated by great distance.
>>8876410
So if I made two pints in one glass, I could split it in two?
>>8876304
Then that proves my point, I always thought rich business men HAD to absolute total fucking retard in order to prosper in business, and I couldn't ask for a better demonstration than yours.
The alcohol might not be helping as well tho
>>8877935
What if I was in fact LARPing as a businessman and was a NEET instead?