Calculus Review

>>8873504
Apostol / Spivak
unless you never learned and you don't want to actually review? just memorize or whatever? in that case steward or something

I don't really like Spivak, and I don't really understand the american autism towards this book, like it's holy or something. It will take you 1.000 years to solve all the exercises, because none of them are trivial. But if you like a challenge, sure, go for it.

I'd go with Apostol or one of the russian books I forgot the name, they're pretty good too.

>>8873514
I did first year calc in the past, single variable differentiation, integration, infinite series etc. I have to finish a second year calc course covering differential equations and other series things, so I feel I need a fairly good grasp of the material.

>>8873527
ocw.mit.edu 18.01sc is pretty good

>>8873504
Professor Lenoard or whatever his name is on YT is probably the most accessible.

>>8873504
What's you're major/interests?

https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html

>>8873553
Comp Sci. I have been working on firmware and embedded systems for a few years, but figure I should finish a degree before I get too old.
I have an interest in machine learning, so I am going to try to add a few extra probability and stat courses beyond what is required.

>>8873553
>https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
Thanks for that

>>8873560
>Comp Sci. I have been working on firmware and embedded systems for a few years, but figure I should finish a degree before I get too old.

Why not Computer Engineering?

>>8873504
james stewart - Calculus Early Transcendentals, any edition