Is this accurate?

I think you're on to something. Bring this to Bill Nye

>>8871696
Add another axis for [math]\mathbb{R}[/math] don't real.

>>8871709
>R don't real.
Doesn't the x-axis cover that?

Anyway I suppose I should give some kind of justification for my placing of the equations:

>y-axis (Authoritarian/Libertarian)
Covers the extent to which you support in non-standard approaches.

>x-axis (Economic left/right)
Covers the extent to which you believe small differences should be ignored in the pursuit of equality.

Yes, it feels good to be red.

>>8871696
the x axis should be flipped

>>8871855
I was considering putting 0.999...=1 on the (economic) right for a while, because of
>in the long-run, the free market will fix it
but decided against it in the end, because the economic left is much more closely associated with universal equality than the right (for whom the right to choose is meaningless when everything is equal).

>>8871852
>I believe that this pair of Cauchy sequences in the same equivalence class are equal but that pair of Cauchy sequences in the same equivalence class are not equal, because my professors said so
Someday you'll learn kid

You either die as /sci/ or live long enough to become /pol/

>>8872091
the completeness of real numbers is just an assumption

>>8871696
Full top left

>>8871696
not at all

>>8871696
bottom left

>>8871696
1/4th of this chart is truth
Why is truth so scarce?

>>8872137
???
The real numbers are complete by definition, since the real numbers are just the completion of rational numbers.

I'm mainly libertarian and I believe that 0.9999=1.