Thread replies: 32
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: grouplogo[1].png (19KB, 420x200px) Image search:
[Google]
![grouplogo[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/5qAacUy.png "grouplogo[1]")
19KB, 420x200px
Is it possible to have 200% of an apple?
>>
If you bought to many of them yes.
>>
Allow me to reword.
Is it possible to have 200% of 1 apple?
>>
fanbois are convinced that no other kind even exist
>>
>>8866378
Yes but the existence of two apples is not what I am asking about.
I'm asking can I have 200% of a single apple.
>>
>>8866380
200% = 3x
Percentage difference = (change in percentage)/ (original percentage) x 100
So to have 200% of one apple, you'll have to 200% = 3-1 apples/1 apple x 100%, it's fucking elementary mathematics you're all fucking stupid, I'm getting out of here.
>>
>>8866380
>200% of a single apple
That's two single apples
>>
>>8866380
But 200% means just that. That you have 2 of the same object. If you mean that these two aren't exactly the same then you can consider cloning the first one
>>
>>8866386
>Percentage difference
he didn't say 200% more
100% of an apple is an apple
if you have 1 apple, then 100% more apples is 2 apples.
you are stupid
>>
>>
>>8866397
It only says "200% of a (single) apple"
That translates to 200%*1 apple which equals to 2 apples
There is no point in 200%=1 apple
200% of what? For example 200% of apple halfs are really equal to 1 apple
>>
>>8866397
>The question is literally just 1 = 1+1 true or false.
That's not the question though.
>What is 200% of 1
that's the question m8
>>
>>8866380
No, it's an abstraction. You need to clearly define some things before logically breaking it down. You could consider doubling the size of the apple to be 200% of the original apple. It all depends on what terms you're thinking within. AKA it's useless, pseudo-philosophical semantics.
>>
>>8866371
2 apples = 200 %
>>
>>8866421
[citation needed]
>>
>>8866371
200% implies 2, an implies 1.
You can't go outside the 100% spectrum.
>>
>>8867032
>You can't go outside the 100% spectrum
You were born with an IQ of 3
So now it's six.
OK, your hypothesis seems to hold.
>>
>>8867039
IQ is a social construct and is part of a spectrum.
>>
Take a sample size of apples of a specific variety, and find the average size of an apple. Then, fine one of the same variety that is twice the mass, there you have found 200% of an apple.
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banach%E2%80%93Tarski_paradox
>>
>>
>>8866371
Maybe, you could have another apple that is 100% bigger than your implied reference apple
>>
File: apple-big-little-1.png (141KB, 600x384px) Image search:
[Google]
141KB, 600x384px
it depends on how do you mathematically define an apple?
is it defined by the geometry (1 spheroid object) or by volume? (green apple is 200% more apple than the red)
>>
Do you need to have a normal pumpkin in your possession to know that a giant pumpkin is giant?
>>
Not OP but related question
If a nutrition label has 400% of something then what is that 400% with respect to? Itself? Daily serving recommended? I've seen stuff with 400% vitamin c
>>
200% of a single apple is an apple that takes the form of two apples
>>
>>8869982
the latter
>>
>>8866377
Yes - that is, if we were to bring in the special circumstance where there exists a properly defined unit for 'apples' ; then, you may come across an apple which is a genetic outlier, and is 200% that of the unit value. This unit value may be defined with respect to some property, such as volume, density, or both.
>>
Why aren't these kinds of threads just instantly deleted?
>>
File: 1486523467893.jpg (127KB, 1000x664px) Image search:
[Google]
127KB, 1000x664px
>>8866371
Yes, just make the default state of 1 entity 200% in your current lexicon and there you go, 200% = 1 apple.
Thread posts: 32
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4