redpill me on toxicology

>>8865026
First you have to understand that toxicology is on a spectrum.

File: emulator.jpg (223KB, 620x474px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 620x474px

>>8865026

Every substance you took has a therapeutic RANGE; above the upper limit of that INTERVAL, you get an overdose which may be lethal; under the down limit of that SPACE, you don't get the effect you're searching when taking a substance.

The same happens with toxics, but with unwanted effects every time the down limit of the SCALE is reached

>>8865062
Is the Field worth going into?

>>8865062
bullshit, it is possible even for a single molecule to kill you. A single molecule, say a long polymer moving at very high percentages of the speed of light could easily kill you.

Alternatively, a single strand of ebola or other virus DNA(it's still one molecule) inserted into just the right place in one of your cells could kill you.

File: half-meter-carbon-nanotube.jpg (118KB, 681x483px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 681x483px

>>8865745
other ways single molecules could potentially kill you: you could hang yourself with a long enough nanotube, a large enough graphene sheet formed into a bag over your head could asphyxiate you, you could slit your wrist with an atomically perfect diamond crystal.

>>8865773
If you're counting crystals as 'molecules', you could hit yourself in the head with a hammer.

>>8865779
a hammer won't necessarily be a single crystal

>>8865796
It will if it's made out of a diamond

>>8865062
So, toxicity is nothing but a spectrum?

>>8865026
theres an interesting BBC documentary about it

>>8866007

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>8865026
Toxicity depends a lot on the amount of a substance, which makes it a spectrum.