Explain these results.
Pro tip: If you can't, you do not deserve to browse /sci/.
do your own homework brainlet
>>8861913
This is taken from a research study I conducted, idiot.
>>8861912
p-value is less than .05, which means the relationship is statistically significant.
that's about all I got for you, is that STATA?
You calculated the significance between dog ownership and something involving the federal government.
>>8862007
>"Playing it safe is the most dangerous thing you can do"
>>8861961
Yes it is. I actually like STATA quite a bit.
The mean value for some dependent variable is 4.06 units higher for people who don't own dogs rather than people who do own dogs and the relationship is statistically significant
>>8861912
>Standard deviation 23.65
wew
>>8862113
Isn't that kind of odd given the sample size? Or would we need to know what the variable is first to get some context?
>>8861912
The mean is not representative with such a high standard deviation, you would have been better off calculating the median.
>>8862193
smalltacogrill.webm
If i'm 14 and have I attained brainlet status? I have no interest in stats or any maths outside of physics
>>8862329
wth is a brainlet
>>8861912
understanding basic statistics ≠ being smart
you got a tiny difference but the sample size made it "statistically significant"
>>8861912
What is there to explain? It looks like you just plugged some numbers into a computer program. Why don't you explain how you would conduct a t-test or compute a confidence interval by hand?
>>8862568
Who in their right mind, in the 21st century, conducts a t test, a confidence interval, or even a multivariate regression, BY HAND?
>>8862646
No one does, but anyone who uses them should have a good enough understanding of what they are that they could do them by hand if they had to.
>>8862646
Who in their right mind, in the 21st century, conducts a derivative, an integral, or even an Euler's method linear approximation, BY HAND?
>>8861923
do ur own paper brainlet
>>8861912
all i can see
think i'm browsing too much of /b/
>>8862714
wut?
You shouldn't be using the t test. You have more than 25 sanple size.
Use a z test instead.
>>8862908
Continued.
As a result of your sample being too high, you can't pick a decent critical value for your degrees of freedom. Therefore you cannot tell whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis based on the critical level percentage.
>>8862007
>i'm going to call big brother if you don't improve yourself
lol