Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
>professor how many neurons will we have to simulate before we get real intelligence?
I say. I don't know. How many atoms do we have to simulate to get real gravity? And then everyone loses their shit. It's hilarious.
>>
>>8843760
What is real intelligence?
>>
It's true though. Intelligence and consciousness is a continuous spectrum
>>
>>8843760
That actually would be a good argument if you assume that consciousness does not arise from a mere structure and interactions of parts within it. However, we don't know whether it's true or false, and most scientists are materialists, so they will most likely answer negatively, thus your point does not invalidate their views.
>>
>>8843767
I don't fucking know. What's a real ball. A ball that exists? There's your answer
>>
>>8843777
>consciousness is real intelligence
>consciousness required for real intelligence
No.
We can worry about consciousness when we have something intelligent enough to claim it has it.
>>
>>8843846
You better fucking figure it out then.
>>
>>8843850
I have consciousness.
>>
>>8843877
Then what does this say?
>>
>>8843880
Aranha HARLOW
>>
>>8843882
you're just a human tho we're talking about aye-eye
>>
>>8843851
god you're stupid
What's a real ball? A ball that exists.
What's real intelligence? Intelligence that exists. Its a continuous scale of quality. We are a multitude of intelligent modules doing different types of intelligence in some unified way.
>>
>>8843886
x atoms = y gravity
x neurons = y intelligence
You're not addressing what intelligence is.
>Its a continuous scale of quality. We are a multitude of intelligent modules doing different types of intelligence in some unified way.
>god you're stupid
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2