wats science??

File: 1432067001553.cached.jpg (312KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 2000x1333px

studi of stuf

>>8833408
wat staff

>>8833406
A miserable little pile of secrets!

>>8833406
The use of the scientific method

>>8833406
a materialist attempt to define the world into a series of nominal qualia.

white devil magic

>>8835450
>qualia

I'll have a decaf frappachino to go, please.

>>8835490
I BRAINFARTED RRRRRRRREEEEEEE

File: 9a17ee6d145237037beb33cb0bef4021c9079f13cb44a48b274ac9c95e94a2c0.png (27KB, 752x596px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 752x596px

>>8835450
>implying there are things that exist outside of physical reality

>implying unexplained phenomena don't have materialist explanations that just have yet to be found

>>8835568
>implying materialist explanations do anything except describe observable phenomena.

>implying observational descriptions can explain what material is and not just what it does.

>>8835544

I'm glad you can at least admit it. Now where's my coffee?

File: 1470036096768-0.png (24KB, 661x578px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 661x578px

>>8835578
>implying knowing the nature of every elementary particle of every atom of every molecule of a material doesn't tell you what the material is

>implying "what a material is" is a meaningful question outside of describing what it does

>implying matter has magic intrinsic value independent of the way it interacts with other matter

>>8833406
systematically trying to avoid confirmation bias, by counting both the misses and the hits

>>8835655

>implying that the described causal interactions between matters are not themselves inherently magical correlational phenomena

>implying that experimentally 'knowing' the nature of particles, atoms, and molecules tells you anything in regards to why those interactions occur.

>implying that observational science isn't inherently biased by constructed notions of perception and meaning.

>>8835734
He cant handle the truth, dont hurt him

File: 92f4fef90a2b5d53f655d040e30db19e8ab938ae5fa25e806d8023b2c0e02dd4.jpg (64KB, 1127x1015px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1127x1015px

>>8835734
>implying the causal interactions between matters cannot be explained in a way consistent with our current understanding of how nature works

>implying particles, atoms, and molecules need a reason or transcendent purpose to exist and interact with each other

>implying literally everything, including every point in your post, isn't inherently biased by constructed notions of perception and meaning

>>8833406

set of things we know to be false