this program is utter horse shit
it draws all the bonds at different lengths and I cant make a fucking circular catalytic cycle to save my life
look how awful this looks
do other fields have similar pieces of software that they hate?
GIT GOOD
>>8831604
yeah it's shit.
your reaction seems to be explosive
>>8832070
pretty sure the risk associated with ethylene production can be mitigated with nitrogen sparging
>>8832070
Good one.
>>8831604
>do other fields have similar pieces of software that they hate?
Doesn't everyone hate LaTeX equally?
>>8831604
I notice you don't have the American chemical society official font sizes installed.
I use MarvinSketch for chemistry stuff.
Comfy as fuck and open sores.
I had to use FlyBase for PCR funsies. God it's a PHP encoded nightmare
>>8833377
[eqn]\color{#9BA130}{> \mathfrak{ \overline{ \underline{ implying ~ \LaTeX ~ is ~ not ~ the ~ best ~ medium ~ for ~ producing ~ quality ~ shitposts } } } }[/eqn]
>>8834022
+1
No, fucking seriously, all you have to do is get good at ChemDraw. Just fucking YouTube a tutorial on how to draw a catalytic cycle FFS
>>8831604
CHEMSKETCH
CHEMSKETCH
The freeware is excellent and the fullversion propably even better.
Draw by hand and the scan
1) it takes practice---you get better
2) Make 1 arrow for your catalytic cycle and copy and paste it so they are al the same length
3) Use "clean up structure" to reset your bond lengths and angles to something more uniform
>>8834322
thisssss