If 0.999... = 1.000.. then does ...999 = 100...?
>>8827116
no
9.9999.. = 10though
and so is 99.99999... equal to 100
you get the idea, frog brainlet
Actually ...999=-1
>>8827118
funnily enough, this is literally true in the ring of 10-adic numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number
>>8827116
mods delete this shitpost thread
>>8827116
Why will this acutely autistic meme not die?
>>8827117
if you believe a bunch of infinitely repeating nines can equal 1 with an infinite amount of zeros after it then how can you then say a bunch of infinitely repeating nines cannot equal 1 with an infinite amount of zeros after it?
>>8827125
That's the joke
>>8827151
>if you believe a bunch of infinitely
STOPPED HERE, INFINITY DOESN'T EXIST
>>8827116
>...999 = 100...
Yes
>>8827125
>10-adic numbers
Oh sure, 10 is such a nice prime number, isn't it?
>>8827160
then how can 0.999 = 1.00?
wouldn't that mean 0.999 can never reach 1 and is therefore not = 1?
>>8827177
0.999 = 1.00 EVALUATES TO FALSE
WHAT YOU MEAN IS
0.999... = 1.00
WHICH IS EVALUATES TO BULLSHIT BECAUSE 0.999... ISN'T AN ACTUAL NUMBER BECAUSE INFINITY DOESN'T EXIST
>>8827116
What's with the leading …?
>>8827116
Is it the same person that keeps starting these threads?
>>8827116
I AM SO FUCKING SICK OF THESE THREADS GETTING INFINITE REPLIES
DO YOUR FUCKING JOB YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING IDIOT MODS
>>8827185
the number grows by the same pattern infinity in the positive direction.
>>8827156
you never can tell these days who's joking or not
>>8827190
Then it's equal to infinity, not 100.
>>8827171
>the ring of 10-adic numbers
the only reason you'd want p to be prime is to get a field. you can still define a ring of n-adic numbers for any natural number n.
>>8827597
then 0.999.. is = to infinity and not 1?