can science be used to justify mysogyny?

>>8816964
Theoretically. Science could "theoretically" prove that colour is made by the number of pirates in your anus.

>>8816972
>theoretically
>war brides (no concept of loyalty to their tribe)
>lower IQ than the upper range of males
>physically weaker
>lower reaction times
>emotional thinking
>worse 3D spacial skills
>worse manual coordination

Probably not

>>8816964
No. But those bitches be dumb.

>>8816975
You could say this about more than half the posters on this site in comparison to the human species at large.

>>8816975
>implying coercion played no part in that
>The sciencey toys are almost all aimed at boys
>doesn't matter
>citation needed
>subjective, citation needed
>citation needed, upbringing
>see above

>>8816986
>>The sciencey toys are almost all aimed at boys
>Truth has a gender bias.

>>8816990
>those toys are marketed like that because of society's biases
>therefore those biases are entirely accurate

>>8816964
hot

>>8817000
>there's not biological diferences in the brain between the sexes
>gender is a social construction
>being a liberal

>>8816964
No because of the is-ought gap. It's fallacious to make a normative claim based on descriptions of the world, as there are no logical connections between how things are and how we should behave.

>namefagging as "OP"
Just kill yourself, no one cares about your stupid opinion.

>>8816964
You can use science to back up all kinds of ideologies. The deal is just that in the end you need to plug-in some external idea of what you want/don't want. You need to make up those things, they can never be extracted from science alone.

>>8817108
kekekekekek

>>8816964
Sexual dimorhpism is a thing, and in certain regards females are inferior.

Don't get too uppity over it though.

>>8817108
Why don't you have a girlfriend, fuccboi?

>>8817165
dont think my wife would like it 2bh

>>8816964

actual, real science will ALWAYS come to uncomfortable differences between people and things.

so yes, any sufficient amount of science will arrive at grounds for discrimination between any two things.

File: Darwin-Awards.jpg (81KB, 618x618px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 618x618px

>>8816964

Darwin Award winners!

I'm a progressive socialist left winger, whatever you want to call it, and I accept most of the behavior of my peers, but can someone explain to me why people deny sexual dimorphism? It seems many people are being "taught" that sexual dimorphism isn't a fact, and it's baffling to me. Can someone explain this.

>>8817191
Lol cuck

Hey guys, OP here namefagging. Just wanted to let you know that I looooooove to suck on big hairy balls. Thanks!

>>8817836
roastie detected

>>8817426
>why people deny sexual dimorphism

people love to complain about this on this site, but I've never encountered someone irl who believed this. can you give an example?