Antimatter dilemma

>>8809840
CP-violation

>>8809840
All Matter Matters

>>8809840
There's 2 possible reasons.

1. There wasn't equal amounts of matter and antimatter, for some reason.

2. All of the matter and all of the antimatter have not yet met, hence they have not yet annihilated each other.

File: 1490608764149.jpg (51KB, 522x451px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 522x451px

>>8809840

Matter is the only thing that could quash the antimatter? If in the beginning of the universe was an equal amount of antimatter and matter (as you said) and "all antimatter cancel all mater", there's no logic in the fact there's an amount of matter now, but no amount of the original antimatter. Taking your two assertions as true premisses (1 - there was an equal amount of antimatter and matter / 2 - all antimatter cancel all matter), there's only two possibilities for what happened in the beginning of the universe. More matter arose before the original matter was annulled by the original antimatter, or in fact there was two amount of antimatter in the beginning of the universe. But is that possible? Could two combinations of antimatter originated a matter amount? And, on the other hand, where did the extra matter come from if that really happened? Physics is discussing an annulment law, you see. "Antimatter cancel matter". But what kind of thing could create matter and antimatter?

>>8809904
>All of the matter and all of the antimatter have not yet met, hence they have not yet annihilated each other.

Also this, in my view. Thank you, anon

>>8809840
>In the beginning of the universe there was an equal amount of antimatter and matter.
[citation needed]

>>8809922
>>8809929

Same guy here. I'm thinking about the the thing I've said before. > theres no logic in the fact there's an amount of matter now, but no amount of the original antimatter. Well... Unless the laws of physics (?) you've pointed out are wrong. And, in this case, the truth is that >matter cancel antimatter. Is that possible? I need the exclusion of the absurd hypotheses of my reflection, because I don't know anything about that physics laws.

>>8809945
>>8809930
>>8809929
>>8809922
>>8809904

Literally the second fucking post.
>>8809850

Produces a very slight excess of normal matter over antimatter. Would produce a bit of normal matter and a shitload of energy if the universe began 50/50.

>>8809840
Semantics. Both are words created by random people to describe unknown phenomenon.

Just the use of the word antimatter shows how little we know about 'matter'

>>8810164
>Just the use of the word antimatter shows how little we know about 'matter'
but anti-matter is the mirror to matter in all ways.
a positron instead of an electron.
an anti-proton (negative) instead of a proton
an anti-neutron instead of a neutron
etc.
it is the exact opposite of matter in how it is, it is the anti (opposite) to matter.

please don't be a pretentious fag and assume ignorance for unexplained phenomena.

>>8809840
>antimatter

>>>/x/

>>8810852
>being this retarded
when was the last time you picked up a physics textbook brainlet?