Which degrees do you consider to be for brainlets?

CS

>>8809239
Yours

>>8809239
Not
>Maths
>Physics
>Elec Eng
>Chem Eng
>Computer Eng

>>8809239
Humanities in general, nutrition, physical education.

>>8809239
Retoric wankfests like 99% of humanities.

>PPE
>Classics
Basically I am a spoilt shit who went to Eton and want to be a conservative politician like my dad the degree

>>8809239
Interdisciplinary Engineering

>>8809239

Not electrical engineering

>>8809251
Except for philosophy

>>8809281
>Except for philosophy
This.
I am very good at mathematics but trying to comprehend philosophical books is a nightmare.
I have trouble storing all those long sentences in my working memory and working on them.
Plus sometimes I don't get the whole point of an explanation and it's like grasping for air underwater.

everything but math

File: Brevity-is-the-soul-of-wit.jpg (163KB, 2000x966px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 2000x966px

>>8809239
humanities because there is no substance. everyone explains the most basic concepts with long winded sentences and fancy words to make themselves seem smart.

>>8809281
Philosophy was great until Foucault and the other post-structuralists ruined everything.

File: what-majors-are-worth-it.png (1MB, 1484x2130px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1484x2130px

>>8809239
anything under the average = brainlet

>>8809239
None of them.
Some degrees might be easier for a moron who doesn't care about the topic to get passing grades, but if you're at a university (and so have access to people and resources) there's no reason you can't put the work in and get good at whatever the hell you're studying.
It's not like the world is too small for someone to become an expert on something, just because it's not STEM.

>>8809337

foucault is good though

>>8809251
>nutrition
>not dietetics

brainlets baka