Obviously perpetual motion is impossible as far as we know.
But I'm curious to see if there are any machines that generate energy very efficiently but just can't quite achieve over-unity due to a subtle quirk in physics (e.g: Friction or some microscopic force / phenomena) that prevents it from doing so.
I'm not looking for things that preserve energy like a flywheel in a vacuum. The device actually has to generate / convert energy of some form to another efficiently.
I'm looking for interesting dead ends.
>>8806418
Not sure if there is a device that can reach that high of an efficiency, there are too many physical boundaries to overcome
>>8806418
There are none, PM is impossible even in theory because of time and entropy.
>he unironically uses the word unity.
>>8806740
Space-time crystals are in perpetual motion but cannot produce work.
>>8806418
Closest you'll get is time crystals
>>8806418
>obviously perpetual motion is impossible
Incorrect as usual.
Sun is practically giving up infinite energy. Only mathematician would call the Sun finite in energy.
>>8806801
found the engineer
>>8806804
Say, how many years have you scientist-guys observed the Sun? Oh, only 300 years? And what kind of analysis have you done on it? Oh, only spectrophotometry from far away. Aww, how cute that you make predictions about the future of the universe 5 billion years forwards when you can't even predict what weather is it tomorrow
>>8806816
People understand fusion anf we know sun is powered by it you brainlet.
>>8806821
Prove it atheist
>>8806821
Sure, I agree it derives some of its energy through fusion.
>>8806828
Cool. List some of the other mechanisms and provide discriminatory predictions for them.