Science is obviously dead, but maybe technology has still a few

Might be a bit late but time crystals could help creating stable quantum computers. More computing power could be useful for more complex neural network.

>>8802934
Science isn't dead, just mislead so don't dread its alive and well I'm doing alchemy under my bed. I'm not Ahmed, no clocks or smoks in my shed, I no work for FED cause my science makes em want me dead. 1 field 1 theory 1 mind 1 query. Does the ride ever end? No oh no... It doesn't my deary.

>>8802934
How could science be "dead"?

File: 578367.png (506KB, 605x718px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 605x718px

>>8803008
Have a (You)

File: 1483927540591.jpg (34KB, 387x396px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 387x396px

>>8804611
It's not. OP is just mad he didn't get a stem job.

File: OP.jpg (37KB, 500x342px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x342px

>>8802934
OP is obviously a fag.

>>8802934
That chart looks extremely optimistic. We're already behind schedule on a few of the things it says we should have.

>>8805209
which ones?

It seems fairly accurate

>>8805223
same person as 8805223

There is also a difference between widespread / replaced all other things and is available. On the basis of a technology being available in some primitive state it's pretty much dead on.

For instance augmented reality. Pokemon Go can be a form of AR or any number of tech demos. If you mean mature AR we aren't there yet though.

So basically it is very much open to interpretation but almost all of these technologies exist in some form.

I mean there are fuel cell cars right now. They just aren't economical. There are electronics that use inductive charging. Gene sequencing is pretty much rapid right now and affordable. There is speech recognition software all over the place. etc

>>8805223
Graphene, for instance.

>>8802934
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_fast_reactor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-storage-projects-turns-co2-into-stone/

https://phys.org/news/2008-07-dash-lime-co2-pre-industrial.html
The above approach is especially beneficial when the power is small modular nuclear reactors, and the off-gas CO2 is captured and dumped directly into nearby basalt deposits.

http://www.zmescience.com/research/us-navy-synthetic-jet-fuel-seawater-0423432/

>>8805234
Yes but look at things like vertical farming, desalination, in vitro meat, machine vision.

It's very unclear what criteria they use to say if something exists or is impacting people?

Desalination is widely used in many areas and is set as 2032 technology.

Synthetic biology is set and we already have examples of it being done.

I think as a general roadmap it is pretty accurate though for what it is.

>>8802934
>Virtual currencies
>2018
Also didn't some Asians already created some sort of holography?

>reputation economy

This is literally the worst idea ever.