Our planet is cooling down since 1998.

>>8802796
Stochastically speaking the OP is correct within the domain [1998, 2017).

Ok.

>>8802796
Am I the only one who wishes AGW were real because it would kill off lots of scientists?

>>8802807
You can find people like that on /pol/

You can even go there and talk to them about it!

>>8802813
I'm good here, thanks

>>8802818
No you really out to be there and not here. Now, shoo.

>>8802966
>muh /pol/ bogyman
but good job OP disregarding the obvious clear trend in increasing temperatures of the entire data set. It looks like a few years ago was an outlier for maximum temperature, but the continuum of data is clearly still trending up.

>>8802796
>High altitude atmosphere
>Lower atmosphere
>Landmass
>Poles
>Subsurface water
>Deep water
>Mantle
>Core

The whole planet?
Gee...

>>8802796
Correct. But on global scale, the trend is clearly going upwards

What if OP just tried every possible MA month value, and picked the one that agreed with his worldview?

>>8803007
You just wanted to the only people who does things without irrational axioms.

Go kill yourself zlumpflet. >>>/pol/

File: Escalator_2012_1024.gif (2MB, 1024x697px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x697px

>>8802796
/thread

>>8803127
kill yourself, redditor.

>>8802796
HAAA I FUCKING KNEW IT, GLOBAL WARMING IS JUST A PHASE IN EARTH'S LIFE CYCLE, WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT

>>8803139
/pol/ution pls go

You have nothing scientific to contribute to the discussion, and every single one of your supposed denialist "proof" usually get BTFO'd within hours here.

Feel free to try again, give us your single best evidence and data on how AGW is not happening that is based on scientific data and peer reviewed study

>>8803136
kek btfo

File: last_240_trend.png (6KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 640x480px

>>8803115
>the trend is clearly going upwards
Not much left. The fun begins when the 20 year trend goes south.

>>8802806
Why is a discrete data point at 2017 unbounded?

File: accumulatedsmb.png (109KB, 627x518px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 627x518px

Why it's snowing so much in Greenland lately?

http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/

>>8803642
No idea. But one possibility is that since hotter air can carry more water, more can precipitate as snow when it eventually gets to cold enough areas.

File: wrapping Greenland.png (47KB, 749x773px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 749x773px

>>8803642

kek

http://www.snf.ch/en/researchinFocus/newsroom/Pages/news-170327-press-release-suns-impact-on-climate-change-quantified-for-first-time.aspx

>For the first time, model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.

>>8802796
Cherrypick much?

File: 1488905407171.jpg (46KB, 569x802px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 569x802px

>>8802796
>obvious positive trend

>>8803127
there's less /pol/ posts here than people crying about /pol/

>>8803147
Captain Capslock, fgt pls

>>8802796
ITT Climate denying retards extrapolate from graphs they can't comprehend and rely on cherry picking data to draw conclusions.

/thread

>sage

>>8802966
do u need a safe space buddy?

File: CC_1850-2016 agt.gif (3MB, 720x775px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x775px

>>8802796
I've got an image too

luckily enough, there are still hundreds of scientists that try to understand how climate works:

http://notrickszone.com/2017/04/03/growing-skepticism-already-150-new-2017-scientific-papers-support-a-skeptical-position-on-climate-alarm/

>>8803103
if only you could read English