[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Need advice

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 2

File: 0.jpg (159KB, 1280x674px) Image search: [Google]
0.jpg
159KB, 1280x674px
I had a calc 2 quiz a few days ago and the first question on the quiz was as follows:

[math]\text{Given that } \dfrac{d}{dx} cosh x = sinh x \text{ and } \dfrac{d}{dx} sinh x = cosh x \text{, } \newline \text{show that } \dfrac{d}{dx} sech x = -sechx \text{ }tanhx[/math]

Pic related is my work so that you can see the situation as unbiased as possible. I basically proved it by taking the integral and doing u subtitution.
I got the question completely wrong because I didn't do it by deriving. Teach said I didn't use the given derivatives of cosh and sinh.
But technically I did when I did the derivative of u. And if you were to do the question by deriving you wouldn't even use the derivative of sinh at all because it would be multiplied by 0.

Should I try to get the grade changed? I asked him about it and he said I lost the points because I didn't derive and I didn't use the given identities.
>>
>>8799185
I would also have given you 0 points for that but for different reasons.
>>
>>8799205
Why would you give me a zero? Explain your reasons
>>
>>8799185

Your answer doesn't make any sense. You showed an identity, then integrated something that was not even what you had. I would have also given you a flat 0. There is nothing logical in what you did
>>
Just use quotient rule on 1/cosh(x). And you messed up the u substitution anyway, it should be -1/u^2 inside the integral.
>>
>>8799233
rewrite -sechxtanhx as sinhx/(coshx)^2
Then integrate that.
How is what I did illogical?
>>
>>8799210
No words between the equations saying how they relate to each other or which theorems you use. Not writing why [math]u^{-1} = \text{sech } x[/math] implies that [math] \dfrac{d}{dx} \text{sech } x = -\text{sech } x \tanh x [/math].

Several errors in the equations like
[math]\int - \frac{ \sinh x}{ \cosh^2 x} [/math] instead of [math]\int - \frac{ \sinh x}{ \cosh^2 x} dx [/math]
[math] u = \cosh [/math] instead of [math] u = \cosh x [/math]
[math] du = -\sinh [/math] instead of [math] du = - \sinh x dx [/math]
and most importantly no [math]+C [/math] after indefinite integration.
>>
>>8799251
So basically notation, the one thing that doesn't define understanding.

Thanks
>>
If I were your prof I'd fail you on your hand writing alone
>>
>>8799185
>I got the question completely wrong because I didn't do it by deriving.
No, you got the question wrong because your work is completely fucking illegible, contains errors that happen to cancel each other (you did the substitution wrong despite literally being given the derivative of cosh in the question, and you integrated a basic power function wrong) and there is zero explanation as to what this nonlinear blob of scribblings is trying to do.

it's not some rigid "do it this way or you get zero!!!" Nazi behaviour. If you communicate your solution like a baboon, your TA cannot mark it.
>>
>>8799261
Alright this is a fair answer so I'll just take the grade.
>>
>>8799241
du = -sinhxdx
>>
>>8799185
why the fuck did you integrate on a question that clearly asks you to differentiate?
[math]\frac{d}{dx}(\frac{1}{cosh(x)}) = \frac{0*cosh(x)-1*sinh(x)}{cosh^2(x)}\\
=-\frac{1}{cosh(x)}\cdot\frac{sinh(x)}{cosh(x)}
=-sech(x)tanh(x)[/math]
By integrating you add another step onto your answer as you now need to justify that the arbitrary constant of integration now = 0
>>
What the fuck why integrate and not just use the chain rule? Am I missing something here?
>>
>>8799257

Mathematics is not purely about understanding, it is also about showing to there that your reasoning is rigorous AND comprehensible.

And clearly you DONT understand what's going on because your work makes no fucking sense
>>
>>8799289
it was given that d(cosh x)/dx is sinh x
>>
File: bern.gif (3KB, 583x101px) Image search: [Google]
bern.gif
3KB, 583x101px
>>8799185
>>
>>8799185
I would have given you 0 just for using pen.
Although, it is also ridiculous to not just use the quotient rule for differentiation. In addition, you didn't put in the work to explain that integration is the inverse transformation to differentiation.
>>
>>8800953
The integral of cosine is negative sine anon.
>>
>>8800974
Not op, I only use pen. My tests don't have mistakes though. Pencils promote dishonesty
>>
>>8801639
It also prevents autism.
>>
>>8800975
>that's the biggest mistake in the image
Thread posts: 22
Thread images: 2


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.