Any scientific basis for Big Foot?

>>8797910
Fuck you.

>Always 'seen' as a muscular 8 foot tall monkey man
>Hurr Durr we never see Bigfoot kills because they are vegetarian
>To be the 500 lb claimed size they would have to consume literally several dozen pounds of foliage a day
>To be that size they'd have to be able to cook food
>Find me a bigfoot fire/camp
>Hurr Durr they live in caves
>Sited hundreds of miles from caves
>Hurr Durr they come out at night
>Sited with human/ape-like eyes
>Hurr Durr Discovery channel
>Every show there is 100% fake

How about you give me one legitimate reason as to why you think it's even remotely possible? Also sage

>>8797910
Gigantopithecus

>>8797917
How many raccoons or squirrels do you know live in your neck of the woods? The exact number, I mean

Answer me that and I can answer your question about Big Foot

>>8797928
More than 0, which can't be said for your inbred-fantasy creature.

>>8797934
ITT: bigfoot BTFO

>>8798405
Indeed.

>>8797917
>>8797928
Nice
This asshole spammed this shit to /out/ too
>>>982825

Bigfoot is a perfect example of when Occam's razor should be used

Is there any scientific basis for Big Boss?

What about a smaller north american primate?

>>8798627
H. sapiens, you mean? Yes, science is pretty sure North America is crawling with them.

>>8798495
You do it like this fuckwheat.

>>>/out/982825