What features, biologically, make a person attractive and why do some races (presumably) not have these characteristics?
>>8784126
good luck getting a bone marrow transplant from someone of a different race
>>8784126
You can read more about race here: http://(infinitytan) .net/polarchive/res/749.html#749
Also, check out this blog for European Ethnic distinctions: https://hb dchick.wordpress.com/
>>8784126
Such a shame you people won't talk about race here, I'm not even sure if it's paid shills or what
thisisnotspam4
>>8784135
I'm nearly sure that the shills were ordered to subvert low-population boards to form consensus on political issues, and unfortunately in the US race is a touchy issue when you're busy courting negroes
By the way, black albinos were the first thing that prompted me to research race/ethnic-groups. It's an extremely interesting topic when you aren't programmed to worship the negro
odds ratio.
blacks can't into it
http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Kanazawa,%20Satoshi.%20%22Why%20Are%20Black%20Women%20Less%20Physically%20Attractive%20Than%20Other%20Women%3F%22%20Psychology%20Today,%20May%2015,%202011.pdf
>>8784149
>I'm nearly sure that the shills were ordered to subvert low-population boards to form consensus on political issues
i agree this is most likely happening
the /pol/ bogeyman has only gotten bigger and bigger in the past couple months here, it's thrown around at just about anything not ultra-left leaning
>>8784158
Should have posted that website, another nice starting point.
>>8784162
Yeah, just look at totally apolitical threads like a ylyl on /wsg/, there's frequently some snarky political nonsense there - it was never there before.
That's what happens when America controls the Western media I guess.
I have to say though, it was hilarious to see them really put more effort into shilling like hell AFTER the election and AFTER the inauguration. What a waste of money kek.
>>8784126
Kill yourself imbecile.
>>8784210
Abos
>>8784204
>>8784210
Here's some more interesting links on ethnicity and it's importance:
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/viscous-populations-and-the-selection-for-altruistic-behaviors/
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection#Mechanisms
Bookmark and read later for a real understanding of ethnicity that isn't just: 'I hate niggers' or 'that's racist'
I like science not politics. delete thread. thank
white people are just better at everything. except running and having a big cock
>>8784225
This is biology you fucking retard.
>>8784229
Slavs and Asians are better, whites are overrated.
>>8784231
this is not politics? are they mutually exclusive? lol. wiat for it.... Lol
>>8784122
what organization conducted this statistic? what was the p-value for this controlled study?
>>8784320
it was derived from data mining OkCupid.
>>8784339
So it in no way implies there are racial features that are considered more attractive than others, and is irrelevant to the thread
>>8784122
for me its purely facial structure. I really don't care about skin color but I just find certain facial structures unattractive, like most West Africans and certain Russians
>>8784349
>the scientific method is the only way to gather useful data
>>8784357
>literal rage comic
What year is this? Are you a 12 year old in 2011?
>>8784361
>What year is this? Are you a 12 year old in 2011?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
>Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]
>>8784122
>no source
Please leave this board
>>8784385
you're a faggot.
source: you sucking dick every night.
>>8784370
I'm not arguing with you, I'm mocking you
>>8784449
>>8784449
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
>A non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an invalid argument.[1]
>>8784356
True
>>8784126
Fuck of science denier
>>8784122
Symmetry, Smoothness, Muscularity, Golden Ratio Proportionality.
>>8785842
Says the person that believes all scientists studying genetics and human evolution are "paid shills" for some conspiracy.
>>8785842
Just because there are genetic differences between groups does not mean that the broad classification of races are not social constructs
>>8784122
Racism is only cool when you're 12.
>>8785981
if you're over 12 and a racist, you seriously should seek help.
>>8784122
>hispanic
>Race
>>8785987
The ultimate redpill is to reject racism and the old men who preach it to the young.
>>8785992
Because with so many ecological problems in the world, we don't need fake problems about people's melanin content levels.
>>8785996
Using the scientific method to push racist agendas is not only unethical but also pretty shitty human behavior. Almost ape-level behavior desu desu
>>8786000
And as my good friend Woody Harrison once said(pic related)
>>8785981
what's racist about the OP, you retarded fuck? or are you so brain dead that everything you dislike is automatically racist?
>>8786393
i've never seen or heard of a mudshark that isn't disgusting outside and/or inside. usually it's both, but sometimes it's only one.
>>8785996
damn that chick is pretty hot
>>8784122
I'm surprised those numbers are that similar
>>8784217
>altruism gene
>"white people are more altruistic and work together and that's how they beat the asians who are robotic despite having higher iqs and earth is like azeroth"
indeed, very genetic
you hbd people are so naive, can't see your strings are being pulled
read those tales and rebranded talking points, i'm fine with that
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/118715680