Brainlet here,
Is this accurate?
No. It makes no sense at all.
not really, I think what it is going for is time jump-forward/reversal, but it isn't executed well.
>>8784014
>>8784025
>derive
*differentiate
>>8784014
Change in milk over time (fermentation) = cheese
Accumulation of milk over time = fully grown cow
>>8784025
>is this correct?
what the fuck are you even asking?
>>8784014
sure is
>>8784025
>derive
kill yourself
>>8784014
it makes absolutely no sense because the units of x are not defined. time? distance? what?
>>8784014
no.
integrate milk + beef constant to get cow.
>>8784014
what the fuck is x?
>>8784632
t. brainlet
>>8784025
*differentiate
But yes. They are inverses of eachother.
>>8784014
This image is so shit that it won't even help my little sister understand calculus.
Come up with something better loser.
>>8784014
It's just a wordplay. Cheese is a derivative of milk, and milk is in turn a derivative of the cow.
>>8784643
idiot
>>8785408
shut the fuck up you moron
>cows are 4 dimensional milk cartons
made me think
>>8784623
what a fucking moron, you got mad because I didn't give a shit about the spelling I use when talking to retards on /sci/
>>8788006
Would make more sense if it was dt instead of dx, but it's still retarded
>>8784014
I left milk out and it shows no signs of turning into a cow.
ITT brainlets can't identify joke/bait threads
>>8788067
you need to integrate your milk, cut a piece of cardboard in the shape of an integral symbol and glue it to the milk, it will turn into a cow, just do it man trust me that's how I ended up having 100 cows in my house, it all started with me buying some cartons of milk
It says "dx" when x isn't really defined here. "dt" would be more appropriate since t generally means time.
Either way, it doesn't make sense. "the rate at which milk changes as time changes equals cheese" and "the accumulation of milk over time is equivalent to a cow"