https://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/12/smithsonians_tr/
Were they justified in doing so?
>check out this early human
>it's a fucking monkey
>>8784097
Pretty sure they just meant hominin, but just made it easier to digest.
>>8784379
It doesn't matter, a human is a species of hominid. It's like saying this "primitive cat is actually a dog." No it fucking isn't.
>>8784394
>It's like saying this "primitive cat is actually a dog." No it fucking isn't.
It'd be more apt to say this "primitive felimforme (basal cat-like animal) is an ancient cat." It's inaccurate, but not completely wrong.
>>8784400
>everything that constitutes a human is absent from this animal therefore it's an early human aside from the fact it has a tail and completely different skull and can't walk on it's hind legs.
>>8784407
>Paranthropus boisei or Australopithecus boisei was an early hominin, described as the largest of the Paranthropus genus (robust australopithecines).
>australopithecines
>The australopithecines occurred in the Plio-Pleistocene era and were bipedal, and they were dentally similar to humans, but with a brain size not much larger than that of modern apes, with lesser encephalization than in the genus Homo. Humans (genus Homo) may have descended from australopithecine ancestors and the genus Ardipithecus is a possible ancestor of the australopithecines.
>>8784438
Hominids =/= humans
>>8784442
>hominids=/=hominins
>hominins~humans
>>8784451
So if they were so human, why did they die out?
>>8784454
Outcompeted by other species, or loss of habitat due to changing environments (drying due to the ice age).
>>8784462
I always wonder if the stories of goblins and faeries were our cavemen ancestors passing down stories of us killing the other monkeys.
>>8784471
Perhaps.
>>8784379
that graph is incomplete.
Here's the full version
Bump
>>8784580
>le edgy racist joke that's been made a thousand times
Do /pol/niggers even comprehend the concept of originality?
Bum p
>>8784379
Why is there homo erectus in the middle of the top picture?
>>8784400
>but not completely wrong.
Only it is completely wrong.
>>8785263
wew, someone got triggered here? I thought this was /sci/, not /v/umblr
>>8785263
get a load of this guy