IUTeich Verification Report 12/2014

File: IUTech_1.png (132KB, 871x531px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 871x531px

>>8776174

File: IUTech_2.png (103KB, 828x427px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 828x427px

>>8776188

File: IUTech_3.png (130KB, 871x556px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 871x556px

>>8776190

File: IUTech_4.png (152KB, 825x633px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 825x633px

>>8776192

File: IUTech_5.png (152KB, 824x647px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 824x647px

>>8776197

File: IUTech_6.png (92KB, 825x443px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 825x443px

>>8776201

File: 225413769-121c8749-e69b-4408-abf3-59fe7005e0fe.jpg (48KB, 573x660px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 573x660px

What are the very basic skills one should excel in for moving later into IUT?
Topology->Mathematical Analysis>Differential geometry?

[math]\color{green}{\mathcal{B}}[/math]ump.

>>8776203
sick burn

File: IUTeich Progression.png (42KB, 531x483px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 531x483px

>>8776550

>>8776897
Thank you.

>>8776897

I was under the impression his book was essentially independent from the IUT work.

Why aren't Tao, Kontsevich, etc... looking at IUTech?
Or they're doing this secretly?
If they're so smart and Mochizuki's work consists of 2500 pages max they should be able to go through them.

>>8776897
Riemann geometry by Peter Peterson is so dry. A shame for such a colorful subject

>>8776935

leon tahktajan will soon come out with a response its rumored

>>8776959
Where did you hear about this?

>>8776935
Because people like Tao are in a completely different area of math?

>>8776968

stephen bro get trolled lmao

>>8776980
what?

>>8776968
hahaha stephen you fuck

>>8776971
>implying that truly gifted people can only focus on a specific subdomain
Tao is a brainlet

Are mathematicians just butthurt?
Why do they doubt it when they haven't even attempted to understand it?

funny to see professional mathematicians dismiss a subject because they think it will have no useful applications to their work

>>8776897
>that feel when you are a 3rd semester pure mathematics student and you are at the 1/3 mark, maybe at the 3/8 mark if I count independent study.

Feels bad man.

>that feel when given my curriculum, by the end of my undergraduate career I will be at the 2/3 mark of this list. Maybe at the 7/9 mark if I assume my independent studies will remain as quick as they are now.

Feels a little good, man.

Do you think it would be more accepted it if was white/european mathematician?

>>8777084
No.

>>8776959
>leon tahktajan will soon come out with a response its rumored
Rumored where?

>>8777071
Are you the reddit guy?

>>8777011
>Tao is a brainlet
I was surprise when hes said the doesn't like Topology.
I'm a brainlet but topology is my favorite subject.
How can you be an expert in Analysis and not like Topology?

>>8777121
Fuck.
>I was surprise when hes said the
I was surprised when he said that he

>>8777113
Literally who?

>>8777121
>How can you be an expert in Analysis and not like Topology?

For mathematicians "I don't like" means "I am bad at it." And I can relate because anything that has to do with geometry just doesn't click with me the way algebraic and analytic concepts do.

>>8777154
https://youtu.be/MXJ-zpJeY3E?t=7m41s

>>8777172
7m41s.

>>8777121
>How can you be an expert in Analysis and not like Topology?
I don't think the opinion that general topology is not fun is that strange.
Topology is the worst spot in all of mathematics for the phenomenon of "retarded pathological counterexample breaks something that should intuitively be true."
If you like it when things behave nicely topology is going to frustrate you.

>>8777121
>>8777193
>>8777154


he never said he didn't like, he said it was his weakest area